We performed a comparison between Nutanix AHV Virtualization and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."In terms of features, Acropolis is a good virtualization manager and that it is on-premise. I use almost every technology they provide."
"The initial setup of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is the user-friendly environment. The integration, implementation, and training for the solution are good."
"Nutanix's customer support is good, one of its biggest selling points."
"This solution is very stable and it has been running for the last three months, with no issues."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the built-in data protection, that helps with backup in a matter of minutes."
"This product stands out for its user-friendly interface, intuitive design, and responsive UI. It offers AVH features comparable to Nutanix but at a more cost-effective price point."
"The feature that has had the most impact is data locality. That is a feature that makes Nutanix different from other hypervisors. It helps us to get application performance that is probably double what we got with the legacy, three-tier architecture."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"There are some issues with the interface and integration."
"I would like to see better decompression or degrouping of the VMs so that we can use a single number of SQLs with two servers. We don't need a huge number of DXSPs."
"The technical support for this solution needs to be improved in terms of response time."
"They need to work on the deployment of virtual machines. They need to streamline the process of templates and deploying virtual machines."
"The integration capabilities of Nutanix AHV Virtualization is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Nutanix misses alerts sometimes."
"The solution can be pricey."
"In terms of improvement, I think that they could have more partnerships with providers."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
Nutanix AHV Virtualization is ranked 6th in Server Virtualization Software with 44 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. Nutanix AHV Virtualization is rated 8.6, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix AHV Virtualization writes "Lightweight, integrates well, and the technical support is responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". Nutanix AHV Virtualization is most compared with Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Hyper-V, KVM and XCP-ng virtualization platform, whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, KVM and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.