We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools."A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"The stability is okay."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times."
"The product is expensive."
"While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 2nd in Load Testing Tools with 60 reviews. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.