We performed a comparison between Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Service helps us to deliver the application much more quickly, as it comes with built-in platform APIs for storage, push notifications, analytics, etc."
"Speed of delivery: We were able to reduce development time by 30%."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of OutSystems is easy."
"OutSystems' best feature is that you can build tests with the flow, so even the tests are made in the PDD framework in a low-code way."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems with discipline and the development processes. Instead of each developer doing tasks on their own with their own approach, et cetera, the solution would help bring some organization to the development process."
"The most important features of this tool are its visual modeling capabilities and drag and drop functionality. You can see what you are coding which makes it easy to understand and maintain. They have also created a big revolution in digital transformation by introducing native mobile app development under the same IDE."
"I find it to be a genuinely cool and effective platform for my development needs."
"The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"For me, the most valuable feature is the flexibility the tools give us to change any customer requirements on the fly, when we are in a meeting. I also like how easy it is to deploy the code between environments and how easy it is to integrate OutSystems with other systems."
"One of the key areas in which MCS needs improvement is documentation. New features, like Zero Footprint SSO, need better documentation with detailed integration steps."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"The largest obstacle currently associated with OutSystems is its high cost and limited availability of skilled personnel. Despite being a rapid application development platform, having a highly skilled individual familiar with the platform can be much more beneficial than an inexperienced individual. Because there is a shortage of people with the necessary OutSystems skills, utilizing the platform can become expensive. This makes little sense, considering that a rapid application development platform should be accessible to the average person. However, having a highly skilled individual can greatly increase productivity, making the cost worthwhile."
"There are not enough resources on the market."
"The documentation needs to be more robust."
"The product's high price is an area of concern, where improvements are required."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
"We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."
"The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is ranked 16th in Mobile Development Platforms while OutSystems is ranked 1st in Mobile Development Platforms with 46 reviews. Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is rated 7.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise writes "PaaS for SaaS: Development Tools in the Cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "Useful natural speech to algorithm, reliable, and beneficial automatic task". Oracle Autonomous Mobile Cloud Enterprise is most compared with , whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Mendix, ServiceNow and Oracle Application Express (APEX).
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.