Oracle SOA Suite vs SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
2,006 views|1,358 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle SOA Suite and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We were able to scale out using multiple application and web servers balanced by hardware load balancers and Weblogic clustering.""I found the adapters to be most useful.""It performs better in real-time transactions.""The Oracle SOA Suite has many useful features, and different organizations may place different emphases on the importance of each feature. Certain features are particularly important to the organization, such as the ability to access databases and transform messages, as well as the use of proxy services to secure web services with usernames and passwords. These features can be critical for enabling effective integration and data exchange between systems and applications.""The product allows you to visualize how a company is working currently by providing rich possibilities for analysis such as the audit trails and therefore shows where improvements might be valuable.""The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information.""Valuable features include connectors and BAM.""The new product has come out with SOA Cloud Service and Integration Analytics as well, which gives more options for clients to pick their point of requirements."

More Oracle SOA Suite Pros →

"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"SOA""Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login.""An important area that can be improved is the product's data monitoring. When we use the solution for interfacing or end-to-end data monitoring, we want to know exactly where the data is going and exactly where it is failing, or where there is an issue.""I want to see easier integration connections with other cloud-based tools.""The interface is too complicated. Making modifications still requires too much technical knowledge.""One area that could be better is the human task feature. It could be improved to provide more functionality and customization options because it has limited options available.""The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved.""Its function options can be improved."

More Oracle SOA Suite Cons →

"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."

More SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Oracle pricing is expensive. Support is based on your license. AWS is much better than Oracle in this regard."
  • "It is necessary to evaluate the requirement regarding the platform usage and what the main operation area of the platform will be."
  • "This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."
  • "Based on my knowledge, Oracle SOA Suite doesn't have user-based licensing. It has a system-based licensing model, so you pay for whole systems. Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution, so it's a four out of ten for me."
  • "The pricing is not very high as compared to its competitors."
  • "The product is moderately priced."
  • "Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution."
  • More Oracle SOA Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful.
    Top Answer:The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved. A big challenge for Oracle SOA Suite is that you don't get too many technical resources.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,006
    Comparisons
    1,358
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    7.6
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOA Suite
    NetWeaver BPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle SOA Suite is a comprehensive, standards-based software suite to build, deploy and manage integration following the concepts of service-oriented architecture (SOA). The components of the suite benefit from consistent tooling, a single deployment and management model, end-to-end security and unified metadata management. Oracle SOA Suite helps businesses lower costs by allowing maximum re-use of existing IT investments and assets, regardless of the environment (OS, application server, etc.) they run in, or the technology they were built upon. Its easy-to-use, re-use focused, unified application development tooling and end-to-end lifecycle management support further reduces development and maintenance cost and complexity.

    For more information on Oracle SOA Suite, visit Oracle.com

    SAP Netweaver BPM allows companies to design their process, deploy it, Identify the bottlenecks and finally optimize the process by removing these bottlenecks and hence increasing transparency, efficiency and maintainability.
    Sample Customers
    7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,
    Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and TIBCO ActiveMatrix, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.