Compare Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: June 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""The most valuable feature is alerting.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that the user can customize images of virtual machines in the sandbox functionality. The other vendors only use images that were created by the vendor but not the customer, end-user or partner. This helps to detect advanced threats and attacks.""Generally speaking, it just gives us a broad understanding of exactly what kind of threats occur. The submission point, analyzing point, and virtualization are within the environment that it supports. It helped us to improve our security levels and protect our internal network from any threats outside.""The HTML file sandboxing is very good.""The most valuable features are the protection and that it is fast.""I like the sales operations testing. and support.""The most valuable features are monitoring for advanced persistent threats, the system runs in a sandbox allowing for effective zero-day exploits management, and the Inspector has a built-in sandbox.""The product is very easy to install."

More Trend Micro Deep Discovery Pros »

"I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons »

"I would like the ability to analyze all files in our internal network, at the same time on different operating systems. Not just three of them, but as many as possible.""There are certain aspects of flexibility in the policies that should be added to Deep Discovery.""The stability of the solution could be improved. It should be 100% stable, but it's not there right now.""I would like to see them create a rule where It could integrate with the network and start mitigating with auto-detection.""I would like to see integration with third-party tools to improve the visibility of the dashboards.""The solution needs to be able to integrate better with third-party infrastructure.""The solution could be more stable and offer more security."

More Trend Micro Deep Discovery Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Overall, the price is good.""The price of the solution is lower compared to the competition."

More Trend Micro Deep Discovery Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is alerting.
Top Answer: At times in AutoFocus, when you have a homegrown application or you check another threat intelligence feed, it's not malicious but is still categorized as gray. We need to request a change in the… more »
Top Answer: We are using AutoFocus with my playbooks. We use it on a daily basis. We receive alerts on the Playbook. We receive alerts for threat intelligence, malware alerts, and virus alerts. We use Autofocus… more »
Top Answer: The product is very easy to install.
Top Answer: Our department is purely technical department and we are in place for delivering technical aspects. Therefore, I don't have access to licensing details and pricing. It's not part of my duties… more »
Top Answer: The solution could be more stable and offer more security. When we get suspicious links, we need to make sure they are blocked properly and investigated. Sometimes the asset tool gets locked and I'm… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector, Trend Micro Deep Discovery Analyzer
Learn More

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Deep Discovery is available as a physical or virtual network appliance. It’s designed to quickly detect advanced malware that typically bypasses traditional security defenses and exfiltrates sensitive data. Specialized detection engines and custom sandbox analysis detect and prevent breaches.

Learn more about Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Learn more about Trend Micro Deep Discovery
Sample Customers
Telkom Indonesia
Allied Telesis, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Babou, Blekinge County Council, Delacour, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, Live Nation Entertainment Inc., Mazda Motor Logistics Europe, McGill University Health Centre, Mikuni Corporation, OKWAVE, Sinar Mas Land, SWICA, UTOC Corporation
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company19%
Insurance Company9%
Media Company7%
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider25%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise33%
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, ReversingLabs, Recorded Future and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: June 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 12th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 9th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 7 reviews. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Identifies critical attacks, easy to use, stable, and integrates well ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Helped us to improve our security levels and protects our internal network from any external threats". Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, Cisco Threat Grid, Recorded Future, ThreatStream and Rapid7 InsightIDR, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco Stealthwatch, Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT.

See our list of .

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.