Compare Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS vs. Skyhigh

Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS is ranked 3rd in Cloud Access Security Brokers with 2 reviews while Skyhigh is ranked 1st in Cloud Access Security Brokers with 18 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS is rated 9.0, while Skyhigh is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS writes "Protects cloud data at rest and sends valuable notifications in a timely manner". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skyhigh writes "A SaaS-friendly tool that integrates well with DLP but better integration with on-premise tools is needed". Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Blue Coat Advanced Web & Cloud Security and Netskope, whereas Skyhigh is most compared with Netskope, Microsoft Cloud App Security and Dome9. See our Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS vs. Skyhigh report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS vs. Skyhigh and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Its hands-off security and the fact that we don't have to maintain it are the most valuable features.This solution provides a DLP on the cloud and very few people have a scanning device for data at rest.

Read more »

It gives us visibility into how the data is being used within our cloud environment.It also prevents you from writing data to your Gmail and does not allow you to move your data outside of the corporate system. That is the most important feature for me.There is [a feature] called cloud registry where we can see a risk assessment for the cloud services being used. If we want to add a new cloud service or a new cloud application, we can check into it and do an assessment through the cloud registry.It help us monitor high risk services, blocking them, and also feeding them to our egress points.The risk rating of each cloud application has been very useful. Whenever we discover a new application is use, we are able to quickly determine if this application is safe to use and whether or not we should allow our end users to be able to access it.We have gained a deep insight into our Shadow IT usage as well as the different activities involved in Office 365.Without Skyhigh, we had zero visibility, but now we are aware of so much more.Skyhigh has given us categorization and rating of websites separate from what the web proxy places on the logs.

Read more »

Cons
They automatically update and they should give us time to fully understand what they're updating so that we can make sure it doesn't impact production.I would like to see support for custom applications.

Read more »

The biggest challenge we have with McAfee is their cross-cloud support.I would like to see more power being given to the admin. In the sense that in case an employee is facing an issue and they want to configure a service, like attaching an email in Gmail, for example, they should be given the option to make the service request and get that configured on the go.The only thing we have faced is that sometimes, randomly, the portal becomes too slow.Needs integration with other technology ecosystems.Though the Skyhigh Dashboard is processing large amounts of data, the speed of the Dashboard could be improved.It would be nice to be able to get more advanced search functions to filter out data and quickly obtain the data that we need.The tool could improve flexibility with the creation of reports/querying data.The services take some time to load. It would be helpful if the loading time was reduced.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing for this solution is on the higher end.

Read more »

The licensing fees are based on what environments you are monitoring.They definitely charge a huge amount. All the security service providers charge a huge amount.Have a risk-based approach towards pricing.The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations.Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers solutions are best for your needs.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,397
Comparisons
4,436
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
784
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
7,987
Comparisons
4,409
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
242
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Prisma SaaS, Palo Alto Networks Aperture, Aperture
Learn
Palo Alto Networks
McAfee
Overview

Since software as a service is so easy, use of SaaS applications is exploding. Because of that simplicity, though, the security risks of SaaS are also on the rise. Unsanctioned SaaS apps can expose sensitive data and propagate malware, and even sanctioned SaaS adoption can increase the risk of data exposure, breaches and noncompliance. By offering advanced data protection and consistency across applications, Prisma SaaS reins in the risks. It addresses your cloud access security broker needs and provides advanced capabilities in risk discovery, data loss prevention, compliance assurance, data governance, user behavior monitoring and advanced threat prevention. Now you can maintain compliance while preventing data leaks and business disruption through a fully cloud-delivered CASB deployment.

Skyhigh is the leading cloud access security broker (CASB) trusted by over 500 enterprises to securely enable over 16,000 cloud services, including shadow IT and sanctioned IT.

With Skyhigh, organizations leverage a single cross-cloud platform to gain visibility into cloud usage and risks, meet compliance requirements, enforce security policies, and detect and respond to potential threats.

Offer
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Learn more about Skyhigh
Sample Customers
University of ArkansasWestern Union.Aetna.DirecTV.Adventist.Equinix.Perrigo.Goodyear.HP.Cargill.Sony.Bank of the West.Prudential.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Insurance Company8%
Financial Services Firm7%
Comms Service Provider7%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company29%
Pharma/Biotech Company19%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Transportation Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company13%
Software R&D Company11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS vs. Skyhigh and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,090 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email