We performed a comparison between Panda Adaptive Defense 360 and Sophos EPP Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"It is stable and scalable."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."
"I've found it's got excellent web protection."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"It is stable, and the performance is good."
"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."
"The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine."
"It is easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."
"It is stable."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"Sophos EPP Suite stands out with its user-friendly dashboard and strong web filtering features for enhanced online security."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to centrally manage the total security environment, including the firewall."
"The most valuable features of Sophos EPP Suite are the detection capability, machine learning, ransomware protection, and live response."
"The anti-malware and web filtering are the solutions most valuable aspects."
"The most valuable feature is the central administration and management."
"The solution is useful for security purposes."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"They could have more reports."
"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."
"Improvements could be made in terms of how the reporting is structured."
"We do get the odd false positive when we're trying to install the software."
"They need to offer a clear dashboard so you can see everything everywhere all at once."
"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."
"The stability could be improved. My teammates who use Panda Security and I have experienced some issues."
"Sophos EPP Suite's support services need improvement."
"Sometimes there are issues with the antivirus back logs."
"The solution’s performance could be improved for the end-users."
"There could be enhancements made to the DLP."
"The product should improve support and provide more scalable clustering."
"The solution could improve on the resource management, it is a bit heavy on the resources."
"The product is not secured and doesn't offer a fast connection."
"More integration options could be included in Sophos EPP Suite."
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ranked 22nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 25 reviews while Sophos EPP Suite is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 52 reviews. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is rated 8.2, while Sophos EPP Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 writes "Managing multiple machines is a pain, but support is top notch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos EPP Suite writes "The solution provides endpoint detection and response with a nice-looking dashboard". Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Trellix Endpoint Security, whereas Sophos EPP Suite is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Seqrite Endpoint Security, Trellix Endpoint Security, Coro and Xprotect . See our Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. Sophos EPP Suite report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.