We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
