Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Telerik Test Studio

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Telerik Test Studio is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while Telerik Test Studio is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Telerik Test Studio writes "A straightforward initial setup, easy to scale and a good user interface". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas Telerik Test Studio is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio and Micro Focus UFT One.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Telerik Test Studio? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic.Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization.We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface.

More Telerik Test Studio Pros »

Cons
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually.Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements.

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

The charts need to be more detailed and customizable.

More Telerik Test Studio Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
They do have a confusing licensing structure.We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%.The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process.

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
8,130
Comparisons
3,865
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
635
Avg. Rating
9.5
24th
Views
2,699
Comparisons
2,156
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
165
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Parasoft
Progress
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Telerik Test Studio
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankFox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer7%
Construction Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.