Telerik Test Studio Competitors and Alternatives

The top Telerik Test Studio competitors are
  • Selenium HQ
  • Ranorex
  • Katalon Studio
  • SmartBear TestComplete
  • UFT (QTP)
  • Visual Studio Test Professional
Read reviews of Telerik Test Studio competitors and alternatives
Selenium HQ Logo
SeleniumHQ
Sujal Gupta
Real User
Senior Software Quality Assurance Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 24 2017

What is most valuable?

* Support for UI Automation * Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other... more»

How has it helped my organization?

* It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license * Support different programming language hence DevOps and QA work together to built... more»

What needs improvement?

There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API testing support.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I used SilkTest and QTP before using Selenium

What other advice do I have?

You just need to choose the solution which best suites for you.
Katalon Studio Logo
Katalon Studio
Hans Colman
Real User
Software QA Tester / Team Lead at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
May 23 2018

What is most valuable?

The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error.

How has it helped my organization?

Previously, we had no automation solution for the web. Therefore, this application has helped a lot in automating the web.

What needs improvement?

Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to... more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is no cost for setup or licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not have a previous solution.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is when you need a solution for a web automation tool, then use this one.
UFT (QTP) Logo
Micro Focus
Technical3457
Real User
Technical and Functional Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 26 2016

What is most valuable?

The solution is in the top list for automatic functional testing. It enables you to test a lot of infrastructure, a lot of applications: web, not web, with the different protocols,... more»

How has it helped my organization?

We use it to automate our integration testing. This lowers our total cost because tests are done automatically rather than manually by people. This saves time. With automatic... more»

What needs improvement?

There a lot of things that can be improved: * Support for other environments and other infrastructures. * I hoped that it would also be useful for the internet of things and big... more»

What other advice do I have?

If you want something that covers a lot of testing topologies, use UFT because it has a lot of features. If you are looking for something simpler, and don’t need a lot of automatic... more»

Sign Up with Email