Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. TestProject
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 12th in Test Automation Tools with 2 reviews while TestProject is ranked 15th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.6, while TestProject is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Improved the quality of our automated web services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestProject writes "Codeless test creation has significantly reduced the time required for test script maintenance". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Coverity, whereas TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: July 2020. 430,988 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic. Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization. We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios. | Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%. |
Cons | |
The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually. Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements. | TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
They do have a confusing licensing structure. We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%. The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs. 430,988 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 8,130 Comparisons 3,865 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 635 Avg. Rating 9.5 | Views 499 Comparisons 308 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 392 Avg. Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. |  Compared 84% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| SOAtest | |
Learn | |
| Parasoft | Tricentis |
Overview | |
| Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types. | TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest | Learn more about TestProject |
Sample Customers | |
| Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank | IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm46% Government15% Energy/Utilities Company8% Insurance Company8% Computer Software Company37% Comms Service Provider14% Government9% Financial Services Firm5% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: July 2020.
430,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.