We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."There are fewer false positives when using this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"Tech support is helpful."
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"The most recent is VMDR, which provides a comprehensive overview of how to detect, patch, and remediate specific vulnerabilities."
"They also have threat detection which maps threats. There is a feed that comes from Qualys when a new vulnerability is found. It tells us which machines are infected with that vulnerability."
"Qualys has a continuous endpoint monitoring feature for agent-based scanning. Once you deploy the solution, it monitors everything that is happening every 30 minutes. Then, if there are any vulnerabilities, they are reported."
"Patch management is most valuable. The major selling point of Deep Security is that it is based on the cloud. Deep Security is for the servers and databases of data centers, and generally, for patch management, you have to shut down the machines, and then you have to restart them. So, they need shutdown time, which is a cost. Big enterprises don't want to shut down their database or their data center for any kind of patch. Deep Security creates a wall and downloads all patches. You install it on the cloud. So, it saves your server from any kind of intrusion or any kind of penetration, and whenever you get a chance or time, in six, eight, or nine months, you can physically download or install all those patches in one go. So, it saves you time. It also saves your shutdown time and keeps your data center safe."
"Trend Micro Deep Security is a complete solution and all the threat management has been taken care of."
"DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good."
"The file integrity and log inspection are game-changing features for us."
"Technical support is good."
"The integration options of Trend Micro Deep Security have been particularly valuable."
"It has a perfect SaaS which integrates with AWS, offering flexibility to deploy quickly and easily in the cloud."
"It's scalable."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"Trend Micro Deep Security security and scalability could be improved."
"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"What this product lacks at this stage is the ability to have automated workbooks to do the response. At this stage, the response is more manual, and it is not automated. If there is a response functionality in Deep Security, similar to what we have in EDR these days, to automatically respond to some of the threats, it would be cool. So, we'd like to have an automated response. There should be a response functionality."
"The cost is very high."
"Their automation needs improvement."
"We want to see improved authentication."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 80 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.