Quest On Demand Licence Management vs USU Valuemation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Quest On Demand Licence Management and USU Valuemation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management.
To learn more, read our detailed License Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
23rd
out of 24 in License Management
Views
41
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
15th
out of 24 in License Management
Views
92
Comparisons
62
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
License Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Valuemation
Learn More
USU
Video Not Available
Overview

IT administrators are responsible for managing users' Office 365 licenses including assigning and configuring Office 365 and Azure AD licenses for new employees, cancelling or transferring existing licenses when employees leave the company, and reassigning unassigned licenses to other users. Office 365 license management is a crucial role that ensures the optimum number of licenses are available to support your business today and into the future. Equally important, it ensures that you aren't spending valuable IT budget on more licenses than you really need. Quest® On Demand License Management provides visibility into Microsoft Office 365 licenses and the reporting capabilities needed to help IT administrators achieve optimal license utilization.

With Valuemation you can choose which modules you want to start with. Additional modules can be added at any time if required.

The Valuemation Suite not only covers the usual ITSM processes, but also offers advanced modules – e. g. for software license management, IT financial management, infrastructure and business service monitoring, customer relationship management, innovation management, IT analytics, etc.

In addition, Valuemation can also be used at any time in other service areas and thus as a central tool for Enterprise Service Management throughout the company.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Alphapay AG, Atos IT Services GmbH, AVISTA Corp., Axians ICT Austria GmbH, BMW AG, Bilfinger SE, DataGROUP AG, Deutsche Telekom Technik GmbH, FIDUCIA IT AG, GISA GmbH, Heraeus Infosystems GmbH, Jungheinrich AG, mod IT GmbH, MTU Aero Engines GmbH, Silhouette International Schmied AG, soffico GmbH, Swiss POST CH AG, Viessmann IT Service GmbH, voestalpine AG
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
License Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IFS, Snow Software and others in License Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quest On Demand Licence Management is ranked 23rd in License Management while USU Valuemation is ranked 15th in License Management. Quest On Demand Licence Management is rated 0.0, while USU Valuemation is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Quest On Demand Licence Management is most compared with , whereas USU Valuemation is most compared with ServiceNow.

See our list of best License Management vendors.

We monitor all License Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.