We performed a comparison between SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform and Tenable Nessus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Although it is, in fact, a complete vulnerability management solution, the most valuable feature is the patch management functionality. Most of our customers give preference to this tool over other tools when it comes to patch management."
"I am impressed with the tool's vulnerability scanning."
"The most valuable feature is how it scanned and detected through its database to let us know exactly what fixes we needed to put in place for the vulnerabilities. It detects and it also gives you the way to fix it."
"Out of the box, the product works well for us, so it's not a tool that we need to customize very much."
"User friendly and good dashboards."
"Tenable Nessus is an absolutely stable and fantastic product."
"I have experience with it on my attack stations, and it's pretty good to optimize. Personally, I think Nessus is quite a good product."
"The most valuable feature of Tenable Nessus is vulnerability assessments. There are a lot of threats around the world and this solution is the first to come out with detection rules."
"The product's most valuable features are vulnerability and asset management. It can define the rules and validate the configuration."
"SanerNow has good integration with the more well known ITSM tools, but at the same time there are many other ITSM (IT Service Management) tools available in the market, including local tools here in India, and I'm not sure how SanerNow plans to integrate with them all out of the box."
"I would like to have a management option after the network scanning."
"Tenable Nessus could improve by having more steady updates which will reduce the vulnerabilities."
"In Nessus Professional, the main drawback was that we could have a single-user login password. So it could be better in terms of security."
"The solution should be able to support more devices."
"One area with room for improvement is instead of there just being a PDF format for output, I'd like the option of an Excel spreadsheet, whereby I could better track remediation efforts and provide reporting off of that."
"The problems I faced with Tenable Nessus were related to its dashboard's customization capabilities and its ability to provide data to third-party sources."
"Multiple user access would be an area for improvement from a user-access perspective. A role-based access control feature would be great because at present, there is a limitation with only one account. If that account gets compromised or gets locked, then we will encounter problems."
"Tenable Nessus application device assessment is one of the top tools. However, in the application security assessment, there are other tools that provide better, and more accurate findings."
More SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is ranked 19th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Nessus is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 75 reviews. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is rated 10.0, while Tenable Nessus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform writes "Advanced vulnerability Management solution with out-of-the-box integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Nessus writes "Unlimited assets for one price and quick, agentless results". SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, BigFix and NinjaOne, whereas Tenable Nessus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Pentera.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.