Compare SCCM vs. Tanium

SCCM is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 14 reviews while Tanium is ranked 7th in Server Monitoring with 1 review. SCCM is rated 8.2, while Tanium is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SCCM writes "Enables us to set up schedules, according to security needs, to automate server and desktop patching". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "We are able to go granular while looking at our network and users". SCCM is most compared with BigFix, Ansible and Quest KACE Systems Management, whereas Tanium is most compared with SCCM, BigFix and CrowdStrike.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SCCM Logo
Read 14 SCCM reviews.
37,991 views|26,556 comparisons
Tanium Logo
9,960 views|7,168 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching.This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD.This has made the management of our environment easier.This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system.The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur.It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well.It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer.

Read more »

Tanium has made the process of detecting threats more proactive with its detection. So, the process is easier and more efficient.

Read more »

Cons
The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool.The cost of the product can be improved.This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems.Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell.This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections.I would like to see an agentless version of the solution.The setup was complex and I faced a lot of problems initially because I was new to the solution.Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it.

Read more »

I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free.Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it.Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 34 in Server Monitoring
Views
37,991
Comparisons
26,556
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
510
Avg. Rating
8.2
7th
out of 34 in Server Monitoring
Views
9,960
Comparisons
7,168
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
468
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
System Center Configuration Manager
Learn
Microsoft
Tanium
Overview
With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.

Tanium Endpoint Platform reduces security risk, improves agility & increases efficiency, a fundamentally new approach to endpoint security's threat detection, indicent response, vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance & with management's software distribution, asset utilization, asset inventory and patch management.

Offer
Learn more about SCCM
Learn more about Tanium
Sample Customers
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC BerhadJPMorgan Chase, eBay, Amazon, US Bank, MetLife, pwc, Cerner, Delphi, MGM Grand, New York Life
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company13%
Construction Company13%
Software R&D Company13%
Media Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company30%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government10%
Insurance Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.