We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"I find all Zscaler Private Access features valuable because each replaces flawed technologies, such as EPAs being replacements for VPN and PR as a replacement for PAM, so I can't mention only one valuable feature. Overall, Zscaler Private Access is a good solution."
"The scalability of the solution is great."
"Sandboxing, DLP, and SSL inspection engine are the most valuable features of Zscaler SASE."
"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is the categorization of the dynamic URLs which keeps the customer's environment protected. The threats and the malware are correctly categorized."
"It does the job. What it is needed for. I can use it for VPN, I can use it for secure connections, I can use it as a firewall. So the solution does the job."
"Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet."
"The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."
"Zscaler Private Access is a platform that eliminates the complexity of VPN configuration."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
"The menu for the ZIA portal could be organized a little bit differently. The most-used modules should be at the top of the menus, not somewhere near the bottom, some of them are not organized well in my opinion."
"While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future."
"The stability could be improved."
"SCMP support would be one of the biggest improvements in my opinion. More speed improvements are also required."
"Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security."
"The area that requires improvement is their support. The current support is lacking."
"We often face performance and latency issues with Zscaler SASE."
"It's an expensive solution."
Earn 20 points
SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. SecureLink is rated 7.0, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
