Compare Sift Digital Trust and Safety vs. ThreatMetrix

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."

More ThreatMetrix Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
103
Comparisons
75
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,074
Comparisons
1,575
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
1,259
Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Sift
Video Not Available
Overview

Sift, is the leader in Digital Trust & Safety, empowering companies of all sizes to unlock revenue without risk. Sift prevents fraud with industry-leading technology and expertise, an unrivaled global data network, and a commitment to building long-term partnerships with our customers. Twitter, Airbnb, and Twilio rely on Sift to stay competitive and secure.

Diverse data fuels our technology and community. We partner with industry leaders to deliver end-to-end solutions for our customers. It's simple, we make better decisions as a business when we can harness diversity in thought, experience, data, and background. Sift is working toward building a team that represents the world-wide customers that we serve, inclusive of people from all walks of life who can bring their full selves to work every day, so we can Win as One Team.

ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.
Offer
Learn more about Sift Digital Trust and Safety
Learn more about ThreatMetrix
Sample Customers
Doordash, Zoosk, Zirtue,Traveloka, Cozy
Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm23%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: February 2021.
465,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sift Digital Trust and Safety is ranked 31st in Fraud Detection and Prevention while ThreatMetrix is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 5 reviews. Sift Digital Trust and Safety is rated 0.0, while ThreatMetrix is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "It has a huge database of malicious IP addresses and gives a score for your environment". Sift Digital Trust and Safety is most compared with DataVisor, whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with iovation FraudForce, IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, RSA Adaptive Authentication and Shape Security.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.