We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Performer and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially."
"The solution's setup was straightforward."
"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"It is easier to comprehend the analysis on its on-premise setup but not on its on-cloud setup."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
"NeoLoad can improve the correlation templates, which are specific to frameworks. There's room for improvement in that area."
"An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its price, as it has a hefty price tag."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
OpenText Silk Performer is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 59 reviews. OpenText Silk Performer is rated 8.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". OpenText Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.