We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Silk Performer vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Performer Logo
1,037 views|699 comparisons
Tricentis NeoLoad Logo
6,328 views|3,720 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based.""Its licensing cost is very less."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
Ranking
16th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
1,037
Comparisons
699
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
6,328
Comparisons
3,720
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Also Known As
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More
Overview

Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

Cloud in
Integrated scalability from the Cloud
Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

Retina scan
Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

Monitor
A leading web support for load and stress testing
Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

Comprehensive mobile performance testing
Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Silk Performer
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm9%
REVIEWERS
Retailer18%
Government18%
Computer Software Company18%
Individual & Family Service12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Silk Performer is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Silk Performer is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.