Sophos Network Access Control vs Twingate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sophos Logo
1,942 views|1,206 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Twingate Logo
51 views|59 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sophos Network Access Control and Twingate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Sophos Network Access Control is costly but has a similar price range as CrowdStrike and Check Point. The product can get more market share if Sophos can play around with Sophos Network Access Control pricing and improve it."
  • "I rate the price of Sophos Network Access Control a five out of ten."
  • "Sophos Network Access Control is very cheap compared to other solutions like Cisco, Barracuda, and Palo Alto."
  • "It provides a moderate pricing option for all of its features and benefits."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "Sophos Network Access Control is an expensive solution."
  • More Sophos Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Sophos Network Access Control has a useful interface, and I like its dashboard, which is very useful for us to check everything.
    Top Answer:I last used Sophos Network Access Control for user access control. I expected the solution to combine all of the network devices in our organization. We sometimes have problems with the solution's… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,942
    Comparisons
    1,206
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    464
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    51
    Comparisons
    59
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.

    Twingate is a cloud-based network security platform that offers secure, zero-trust access to corporate applications and resources. Its primary use case is to provide remote access to employees, contractors, and partners, allowing them to work securely from anywhere. Twingate's most valuable functionality is its ability to create secure access policies based on user identity, device, and network context. This enables organizations to enforce granular access controls, reducing the risk of data breaches and insider threats.

    By leveraging Twingate, organizations can improve their security posture and reduce the IT burden of managing traditional VPNs. It also helps organizations to comply with regulatory requirements, such as GDPR and HIPAA, by providing a secure and auditable access solution.

    Sample Customers
    Rushmoor Borough Council
    Blend, Modern Health, Webflow, Liberis, Cerebral, Homebase, Bloomreach, Cameo, Hippo and Bitpanda
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Manufacturing Company29%
    University14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Media Company9%
    Construction Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise39%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Access Control (NAC)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC). Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 7th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 18 reviews while Twingate is ranked 22nd in Network Access Control (NAC). Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.6, while Twingate is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "An affordable solution that provides web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering". On the other hand, Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox CORE, whereas Twingate is most compared with Tailscale, Cloudflare Access, Appgate SDP, FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) and Fortinet FortiNAC.

    See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.