Steelhead vs Symantec Proxy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Riverbed Logo
1,117 views|598 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
2,516 views|2,049 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Steelhead and Symantec Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two WAN Optimization solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Steelhead vs. Symantec Proxy Report (Updated: November 2022).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Chaudhary Muhammad Moez Manzar
Vikram Dhane
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to install the solution.""TCP optimization... caches a particular TCP connection and the next time a user uses that connection he will reach the destination easily.""The compression of Riverbed is very powerful. It can also handle large quantities of traffic.""The most valuable feature of Steelhead is its optimization capabilities.""The connectivity to speed is the valuable feature.""SteelHead works from the application. I use it to optimize traffic from Amazon. It is mainly used for customers who need to increase the traffic to 33K. For other users, it has been more of an operation.""Steelhead is stable, and it can even help you avoid service interruption in the event of a power outage. If your hardware fails, technical support will replace your device quickly.""Scalable data referencing is a great feature."

More Steelhead Pros →

"The developer's assistance is valuable, enabling seamless integration which allows for a comprehensive view of categories, even if not certified by the link.""The initial setup of Symantec Proxy is easy.""It is easy to use, and it is stable and scalable. You don't need a large team for deployment and maintenance.""It enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges.""The CPL code is the best feature of the solution.""What I found most valuable in Symantec Proxy is that it doesn't have any limitations. It also has a simple configuration, with only one window pane, unlike Zscaler, which has multiple window panes. Deploying the agent is also more straightforward in Symantec Proxy.""We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.""The solution is scalable."

More Symantec Proxy Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to have alert notifications.""Application response time and network performance could be improved.""Steelhead's handling of encrypted traffic could be improved because it requires some complex configuration to optimize encrypted traffic, especially when working with Microsoft protocols for mail servers and VPN services""If we load a primary firewall, the secondary firewall usually handles all the active connections, but in Riverbed, this isn't the case. We lose all the active connections at the moment of failure.""The product should offer more integration capabilities.""I would like to see improvement in the solution’s configuration and protocol aspects. We have got some configurations that are not set. I would also like to simplify the call detection of some protocols.""One area for improvement is related to monitoring and visibility.""The application response time of the solution can be improved."

More Steelhead Cons →

"Marketing needs improvement in Symantec Proxy, as it needs to catch up in sales here in the Asia Pacific region. Symantec Proxy licensing renewal also needs improvement.""The initial setup is actually quite complex to install because our users don't have admin rights on the boxes and there's no remote install option by an administrator.""The traffic filtering could improve. Our firewall traffic is limited. Additionally, it would be helpful if there was a dashboard and reporting feature.""Improvements in log availability would greatly enhance its overall effectiveness.""Support response time and case resolution could be improved.""Activating the SSL inspection is one of the challenges. We are currently moving to the O365 cloud, and one of the challenges is the performance when all of our users are connected to O365 by a proxy.""The tool’s reporting features must be improved.""The deployment is quite difficult."

More Symantec Proxy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is expensive and the service contacts are costly too. The cost of the device makes the value proposition borderline acceptable for us. The service contract fees we pay is approximately $30,000 annually."
  • More Steelhead Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In terms of cost, it is expensive. Its pricing has been a challenge for us since its acquisition by Broadcom."
  • "It's expensive. Clients often go to other products."
  • "Licensing is based on a subscription."
  • "The price is too expensive compared with that of another solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees required."
  • "There is a license needed to use Symantec Proxy."
  • "Our cost was based on a three-year upfront CapEx contract."
  • "Symantec Proxy has different expiry dates and renewal dates, which is a problem, so Broadcom should improve the licensing renewal process for the solution."
  • More Symantec Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We just did an assessment for our 47 datacenters around North America. The top two enterprise-level network monitoring solutions were ExtraHop first, Riverbed SteelCenter second. Their negotiated cost… more »
    Top Answer:The connectivity to speed is the valuable feature.
    Top Answer:The application response time of the solution can be improved.
    Top Answer:We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.
    Top Answer:The product is highly priced. There are no additional costs apart from the standard licenses.
    Top Answer:The platform's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    1,117
    Comparisons
    598
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    232
    Rating
    8.0
    15th
    Views
    2,516
    Comparisons
    2,049
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    447
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RIverbed Steelhead
    Blue Coat Encrypted Traffic Management, ProxySG Appliance
    Learn More
    Riverbed
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Steelhead is the leading network optimization and application performance solution chosen by over 30,000 organizations worldwide. The performance of networks and applications directly impacts business productivity. Riverbed draws from nearly two decades of experience in driving network and application performance over Wide Area Networks with its flagship offering, SteelHead. SteelHead delivers the underlying technology that helps enterprises of all sizes maximize the efficiency and performance of the networks and applications used to run modern business. 

    SteelHead is proven to dramatically speed up the performance of applications anywhere in the organization while delivering the best end-user experience even under sub optimal network conditions. Reduce bandwidth utilization by up to 95%, deferring costly network bandwidth upgrades. Increase performance by up to 100x for on-premises applications.

    Symantec Proxy is designed to provide web security, web access control, and secure web gateway functionalities for organizations. It helps protect against web-based threats, enforce web usage policies, and provide secure access to internet resources.

    Symantec Proxy Benefits:

    • Easy to use
    • Comprehensive security features
    • Ability to block malicious websites and applications
    • Efficient management of network traffic
    • Scalable and compatible with various operating systems and devices
    • Highly rated customer support and technical assistance

    Symantec Proxy Features:

    • Web Filtering: Symantec Proxy offers web filtering capabilities to control and manage web access based on predefined categories or custom policies.
      1. Malware Protection: The solution incorporates malware detection and prevention mechanisms to identify and block web-based threats, such as malware, viruses, and phishing attacks. 
      2. URL Filtering: Symantec Proxy uses URL filtering to categorize and assess the reputation of web domains and URLs in real-time. 
      3. SSL/TLS Inspection: The proxy solution supports SSL/TLS decryption and inspection to examine encrypted web traffic for potential threats or policy violations. 
      4. Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Symantec Proxy may include data loss prevention capabilities to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive data through web channels. 
      5. User Authentication and Access Control: The solution supports user authentication and access control mechanisms to enforce user-based policies and provide secure internet access.
      6. Reporting and Analytics: Symantec Proxy provides reporting and analytics capabilities to monitor web usage, user activities, security events, and compliance violations.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Symantec Proxy users. 

      PeerSpot user, Consultant at a financial services firm, says that Symantec Proxy "...enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges."

      PeerSpot user, General Manager & founder at a engineering company, writes that Symantec Proxy has "A complex deployment, no proper user reporting, and a proxy component that works."

      Muhammad Salahuddin, Unit Head - Network and Security Solutions at FPM Solutions, states that Symantec Proxy has "Good URL filtering but is expensive and doesn't have good technical support services."

        Sample Customers
        ElAraby, SFK Leblanc, Bobst Group, Northwest Pipe Company, Halkbank, Tradebridge, EFG Hermes
        Jefferies
        Top Industries
        REVIEWERS
        Government29%
        Energy/Utilities Company18%
        Construction Company6%
        Non Tech Company6%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company17%
        Financial Services Firm13%
        Manufacturing Company11%
        Government10%
        REVIEWERS
        Financial Services Firm42%
        Comms Service Provider17%
        Government8%
        Marketing Services Firm8%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company16%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Manufacturing Company11%
        Government7%
        Company Size
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business14%
        Midsize Enterprise27%
        Large Enterprise59%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business19%
        Midsize Enterprise17%
        Large Enterprise64%
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business33%
        Midsize Enterprise11%
        Large Enterprise56%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business16%
        Midsize Enterprise18%
        Large Enterprise66%
        Buyer's Guide
        Steelhead vs. Symantec Proxy
        November 2022
        Find out what your peers are saying about Steelhead vs. Symantec Proxy and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
        768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

        Steelhead is ranked 4th in WAN Optimization with 22 reviews while Symantec Proxy is ranked 15th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 18 reviews. Steelhead is rated 8.2, while Symantec Proxy is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Proxy writes "A user-friendly solution with good technical support". Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP, whereas Symantec Proxy is most compared with Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, Skyhigh Security, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Service and Zscaler Internet Access. See our Steelhead vs. Symantec Proxy report.

        We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.