Compare SWIFTnet FIN vs. webMethods Trading Networks

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules.
Top Answer: I would like for them to work in real-time.
Top Answer: Our company sells this product to our clients and also integrates them into a client's environment. In most cases, it's the integration of systems, of interfaces with IBM MQ or Insights.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
569
Comparisons
488
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
304
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
667
Comparisons
468
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Learn
SWIFT
Software AG
Overview

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

webMethods Trading Networks is a scalable, easy-to-manage gateway for doing business electronically with customers, distributors and trading partners worldwide. This enterprise class B2B gateway is built on webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) that automates B2B transactions, such as purchase requisitions, orders and invoices. 

Offer
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Learn more about webMethods Trading Networks
Sample Customers
Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, VolvoGist Limited, U.S. Bank, Staples
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: August 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SWIFTnet FIN is ranked 6th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review while webMethods Trading Networks is ranked 14th in Business-to-Business Middleware. SWIFTnet FIN is rated 9.0, while webMethods Trading Networks is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SWIFTnet FIN writes "Has strong stability and professional support". On the other hand, SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct, whereas webMethods Trading Networks is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, IBM B2B Integrator, SEEBURGER BIS and Mule ESB.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.