Ranking | |
Views 614 Comparisons 529 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 80 Comparisons 33 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 67% of the time. ![]() Compared 26% of the time. ![]() Compared 7% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
ActiveMatrix | |
Learn | |
TIBCO | TIBCO |
Overview | |
TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. | TIBCO Hawk is a tool for monitoring and managing distributed applications and systems throughout the enterprise. With Hawk, system administrators can monitor application parameters, behavior, and loading activities for all nodes in a local or wide-area network and take action when pre-defined conditions occur. In many cases, runtime failures or slowdowns can be repaired automatically within seconds of their discovery, reducing unscheduled outages and slowdowns of critical business systems. |
Offer | |
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix | Learn more about TIBCO Hawk |
Sample Customers | |
Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA) | Bunge, Marks and Spencer, Pirelli, Smart & Final |
TIBCO ActiveMatrix is ranked 5th in SOA Governance while TIBCO Hawk is ranked 10th in SOA Governance. TIBCO ActiveMatrix is rated 0.0, while TIBCO Hawk is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TIBCO ActiveMatrix is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Tomcat, whereas TIBCO Hawk is most compared with .
See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.
We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.