We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a great threat intelligence source for us, providing alerts for things it detects on the network and on the machines. We've used it often when there is a potential incident to see what was done on a computer. That works quite nicely because you can see everything that the user has done..."
"The solution is well integrated with applications. It is easy to maintain and administer."
"The threat intelligence is excellent."
"We can use Defender to block and monitor for security purposes without needing multiple other products to do different tasks."
"We also use Microsoft Sentinel, Defender for Cloud, Defender for Identity, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps. They are all integrated and it was very easy to integrate them. In my experience with the integrations, it was just a click of a button and things were integrated. It's just a button."
"I like that it's stable. It's been stable for a long time, and Microsoft Defender has done a good job there."
"The comprehensiveness of Microsoft's threat detection is good."
"The common and advanced security policies for threat hunting and blocking attacks are valuable."
"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"We receive good protection with this solution."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."
"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."
"The manageability of the product itself is its most valuable aspect. You have the underlying EPO, and on top of it, you can deploy the various components as you require. This is unlike other solutions like Symantec where you have to deploy everything or nothing. With this solution, you can choose to only deploy antivirus or only deploy a firewall, or only something else. I choose the components and that deployment is done through EPO. It makes manageability very flexible."
"This is a good solution for antivirus and malware protection."
"I like XDR's workbench feature and observed attack technique. It generates an alert once certain conditions are met. For example, let's say there's a threat called malicious.exe being deployed on your system. It will generate an alert with information like the file path, location, hash, etc. You also see a relational matrix showing how that file was executed and which processes were installed."
"It has good vulnerability protection."
"The centralized visibility is good."
"It helps a lot to understand where the threat is coming from, where is it going, how is it being dealt with, et cetera."
"They were one of the companies, early on, that spent a lot of time integrating their toolsets, and I was really impressed with that... the endpoint management system could reach out to the Deep Discovery system on the network and pick up something that it perceived as a suspicious object."
"We had previously deployed on-premises, and all we had to do was access the designated console and click a button to migrate all on-premises agents to cloud agents."
"It is a stable product. It works very well."
"Trend Micro XDR is a comprehensive solution that is not overly complex to use or manage."
"Advanced attacks could use an improvement."
"Sometimes, configurations take much longer than expected."
"The advanced threat-hunting capabilities are phenomenal, and the security copilot enhances that, but some data elements could be better or have more context inside of the advanced tables themselves. The schemas feel a little limited to what they're building into the product. It's probably just a maturity thing. I imagine we'll see the features I want in the next year."
"In the future, it would be beneficial for Microsoft to consider making the product more user-friendly or simplified for those who are interested in using it. Currently, it requires a high level of technical expertise, making it challenging for beginners or less experienced individuals."
"Automated playbooks and automated dashboards would be preferable to the way the data is currently being presented."
"The user interface of Microsoft 365 Defender could improve. They could make it simpler."
"The console is missing some features that would be helpful for a managed services provider, like device and user management."
"There are other SIEM solutions that are easier to use, mainly based on the creation of rules, use cases, and groups."
"I would like to see more integration with third-party products."
"There is room to improve with scalability."
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"The initial setup isn't so easy. You need to know what you are doing."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"An area of improvement for this solution is to make it easier to manage."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"It would be ideal if they could improve the control of connectivity between sensors."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"We'd like to see a few more integrations."
"Trend Micro doesn't have the next-generation firewall."
"While the continuous addition of features is commendable, the sheer volume of changes makes it difficult to stay abreast of the latest developments."
"The solution could always be made to be more secure."
"They should increase their potential for third-party integrations."
"The area for improvement is mobile security. We have just finished a proof of concept for Zero Trust Secure Access. We withdrew from this PoC because it does not have that many points for proxy across Europe. Our organization is across Europe... At this time, they are only located in Germany and the UK."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 94 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 42 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Apex One and Fortinet FortiEDR. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
