We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT Developer and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.Earn 20 points
OpenText UFT Developer is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 34 reviews while ZAPTEST is ranked 32nd in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText UFT Developer is rated 7.4, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT Developer writes "Integrates well, has LeanFT library, and good object detection ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". OpenText UFT Developer is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Silk Test, froglogic Squish and Selenium HQ, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, ReadyAPI and Automation Anywhere (AA).
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.