Uniface vs WSO2 Carbon [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Uniface Logo
184 views|143 comparisons
WSO2 Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Uniface and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
184
Comparisons
143
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Infrastructure
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Compuware Uniface
Carbon
Learn More
WSO2
Video Not Available
Overview

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

Sample Customers
BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Uniface is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Uniface is rated 0.0, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.