Based on the size and the number of use cases, the solution's deployment can take three or four days to a few months.

The deployment takes almost half a day. If the environment is good, we can deploy the solution in 25 to 30 minutes. It will be helpful to have people who have knowledge of malware analysis and know specific languages that are relevant to the domain to deploy the tool.

An in-house team that handles integrations was responsible for implementing the solution. Myself and other cybersecurity analysts participated with the team.

A team of three engineers handle ongoing maintenance for our large environment. 

We used a partner company here called IT.eam, which helped us with the deployment. They are very capable and professional and it's been overall a great experience.

The deployment took around two to three days and we did it ourselves in-house. We simply downloaded the application and went from there following the deployment process.

The initial setup was configured in Linux on the server. We had a technical guy from IBM who came from Kenya. We only prepared the environment, like setting up the rack, but an IBM technician took care of the implementation. We also rely on the vendor for support and activities that require professional expertise.

It was implemented by team that included me. We have an external team for its maintenance.

We used a vendor team to assist us in the process of deployment.

We implemented it through a vendor team.

We did a direct integration.

As integrators, we can help advise clients and assist in the deployment process.

We have been managing some of the security tools for the past 11 years. We have expert engineers who can help our customers with installation, configuration, planning, designing, and other things.

If you have an environment of 5,000 or 10,000 devices, three to five people should be enough to manage it.

As implementors, we can implement the solution for our clients. 

We completed the implementation and deployment ourselves.

We used a consultant that help us deploy and do maintenance for IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics.

We did use a consultant to do the deployment and we only needed one technician.

We did not use an integrator or consultant for the deployment. We handled it ourselves, with our own staff. Everything was done in-house.

Setting it up requires an assistant like us. QRadar plays a role there, but that's not enough. There is also the language barrier. Not every Hungarian company is good in English, and IBM naturally doesn't have full Hungarian support.

It requires cooperation between clients and us. Typically, we send a team of five people that includes tech guys, a project manager, and maybe one process guy, if needed. Generally, you don't have 360-degree professionals, so you have someone good in networking, someone good in log management or log analysis, and so on. Because of that, we need this kind of team. 

The client also has a few people. Typically, we send in more people than the client. These are not full-time people on our side and client-side. 

We have a technology company, and we are working with them for deployment and maintenance. They spend one or two hours per week maintaining this solution.

We do the deployment for the solution.

The company that we subscribe to for this service takes care of the installation, maintenance, and management of it. They give us updates that concern the features we use, so the maintenance doesn't affect us much.

We implement this product for our clients.

We made use of an integrator. 

We used a consultant to assist with the installation of this solution.

You need application and hardware leads, firewall administrators, network engineers, and server administrators to complete the implementation.

I implemented this solution myself. 

When choosing a vendor, we always consider:

• Scalability
• Diversity of Connecting Systems
• Storage

We handled the solution in-house. We did not need outside assistance. 

The implementation needs a technical team and we have two engineers for the implementation and maintenance.

We handle deployments for our clients. Occasionally we need outside assistance. 

From a product perspective, we have three persons in the product team. However, in the deployment and support team, we have five people. We tend to sell and help implement this product to our customers.

A lot of such innovations or implementations initially can be done by one person, two persons, or maybe a team of five dedicated administrators who later on will be using this technology or solution. You need to understand that there are different roles of people who are working with cybersecurity and threat management, such as an analyst, a simple technical maintenance performer, an administrator, a user behavior analyst, etc.

We do the implementation in-house. I am the program manager and I lead the model from inception to completion. That said, we have to connect with the IBM team to assist with integrating the solution. We're getting pretty good support from them.

We have a security consultant for our deployments. 

We haven't deployed yet, but our client has deployed IBM QRadar. We have been monitoring it, creating rules, and fine tuning it. These are my responsibility with respect to QRadar. 

I did not get opportunity or experience to deploy the QRadar into the client's environment.

I do the implementation and maintenance of the solution.

We handled the deployment with the assistance of a vendor partner. 

We used an integrator for the deployment. The experience was excellent, outstanding.

We implemented it ourselves. Initial seat of pants approach. Worked. I got my Redhat builder to spin up the two VM servers off the supplied image, licensed them, gave them the appropriate IP addresses, created the deployment (the Java 7 bit) and the system started receiving logs from the 1200 CISCO routers.

We implemented through a vendor. I am one of the integrators.

Our requirements are dependent on the size of the deployment and maintenance case, depending on how large of an enterprise solution we are speaking about. The size of the architecture, or for example if the architecture is all in one including the processor, including the QNI and the connector all with one box. A deployment of this type would only require one guy for it if the architecting dissipating these items comes from the all in one box.

We have three people that are supporting IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics.

We had a third party vendor to complete the installation, so it wasn't bad.

We are directly in touch with IBM and we have an IBM security specialist. He usually gives us pointers and he's the one who also gave us a little bit of training and knowledge transfer.

I'm the consultant so we do the implementation ourselves. 

You can implement it by yourself.

We use the vendor for everything. That is the style of the corporation. For these jobs the responsibility and knowledge is on the vendor's side.

Implementation was done in-house.

We deploy it for our clients.

We installed this solution with the help of a consultant.

We used consultants for the implementation. We have five engineers that do the maintenance of this solution.

Our in-house team assists our customers with deployment. Our customers are the main POC and we are able to deploy into their environment, make necessary integrations, and create the rules.

We have almost ten engineers for IT sites.

We used a partner and vendor team and we have expertise in-house.

We implemented it ourselves.

We deployed IBM QRadar ourselves. We have technicians. We bill the client and do the installation on our own, along with other IBM products

The deployment can be done in-house.

We have two engineers that are proficient in QRadar, and we handle the implementation for our customers.

We used our own people and the certified IBM vendor for the implementation. We had a very good experience with them. 

We used a consultant to assist us with the implementation of this solution.

We did the integration ourselves. It was straightforward.