IBM QRadar Previous Solutions

DAX Paulino
Cybersecurity Practice Lead at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We did not use any solutions before QRadar. View full review »
Vulnera08667
Vulnerability Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We used Splunk in the past and we are using both products at the same time. View full review »
Vulnera08667
Vulnerability Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We went with QRadar because it's a more well-known product. I was only using the AlienVault Community Edition, a free version. It wasn't a fully-paid version I was using at the time. IBM QRadar was just the product the company was using. View full review »
Cyberspecial9875
Cyber Security Specialist at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I've used Alien Vault, McAfee, and Splunk. View full review »
Omar Sánchez (Mr.Tech)
Information Security Advisor, CISO & CIO, Docutek Services at Docutek Services
I have used Splunk in the past. View full review »
Damian Scott
Sr SIEM Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We had limited experience with RSA enVision, LogRhythm, and HPE ArcSight. QRadar is much easier and takes less time to implement and maintain. View full review »
Reviewer258
Managing Director at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I previously used Splunk. And, we considered Sumo Logic, which has a similar kind of functionality. But, they are still in a very premature stage in terms of the product development. View full review »
Srijan-Sivakumar
Director of Market Enabling Solutions at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Factors in switching were the console view, as well as Watson. IBM Watson makes a huge difference on the product side. View full review »
Muhammad Adeel
Senior Security Engineer at dig8labs
I have used different solutions in the organization, but the main reason for switching is the customization. QRadar very much supports customization. Another reason is that, in the market, we can easily get QRadar resources, like an analyst or engineer, as compared to other products. This is a reason that organizations move towards QRadar. View full review »
Mathieu Dorckel
Cybersecurity Engineer Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
My service since the beginning has been to only sell and manage QRadar. View full review »
James Davenport
IT Director at MyEyeDr.
We weren't previously using a different solution. As security becomes more and more important, we added different security components from IBM, with QRadar being the last one. We needed some way to see all the data, all the information, and get it together in one single source of truth. View full review »
Douglas Concepcion
Security Solutions Architect at Micro Strategies
We originally used ArcSight, which got cumbersome and expensive. Also, HPE ruins everything that it touches. Therefore, we moved to QRadar. View full review »
Luis Yndigoyen
Partner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We previously used Oracle BPM. We switched for a BPM project with IBM, because it has a better tool at the same price level range. View full review »
reviewer810204
Lead Security Infrastructure Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We previously used McAfee and ArcSight. We made the switch to IBM QRadar for scalability, ease of administration and use. View full review »
Shaikh Jamal Uddin
Information Security Lead Consultant at Secure Coat
Mcafee, switched due to the bad correlation of data. View full review »
Senio9887
Senior Information Security Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We used ArcSight. View full review »
Rajeev MM
Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Previously, I was using McAfee Nitro. Comparing with McAfee, QRadar is user-friendly and easy to use. View full review »
Youssef Boukari
IT Security Manager at a tech services company
We used another solution and we switched due to false positives. View full review »

Sign Up with Email