Imperva DDoS Reviews

• CDN
• DDoS protection
  

Basically, before we found Incapsula, we were getting hit with 5-10 gigabit DDoS attacks, and we were trying to figure out how to fight the attacks. Therefore, we tried Incapsula out on one site, and through the trial we saw what the solution could do – the attacker gave up after a few tries. Once we signed up for an enterprise account with all ten sites we saw the attacks drop weekly.

It would be nice to get a feed from Incapsula to import into our system. We have to have multiple dashboards open at the same time, and it would be nice to have one single dashboard with all our information.

I've used it for eight months.

No issues encountered.

No issues – it has been particularly stable.

Scalability has been pretty good, our European traffic has doubled and our sales have gone up along with our stability.

10/10

10/10 – within 5 minutes we have had a response.

We used a NetScaler mitigation appliance – nothing worked that well, we were getting attacks and they were taking down services.

Setup was fairly straightforward. It took about 10 minutes as I had to fine tune it with our API to mitigate what traffic was being blocked. I was able to determine that pretty quickly and adjust accordingly.

We did it in-house.

Probably about $150,00-$190,000 savings. It's hard to predict, but that would be my ROI estimate.

It costs around $7/month, really cheap.

We looked at CloudFlare. We tried it but it didn’t work that well.

Make sure you use a premium DNS provider. We had to move from a basic DNS provider to a more complex one to get it work with Incapsula 100%.

WAF configuration is the most valuable feature.

• Reduced spammers during competitions
• Bot reduction

Improve reporting interface and filtering.

I have used it for two years.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

Mostly, we have not encountered any stability issues, except the occasional leak from the HK pod.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is good.

Technical support is good.

We previously used Fortinet.

Our ROI is about 45% since deployment on reduction of our cloud bill.

Pricing and licensing is extremely competitive.

I like the interface, customer service, and info updates.

We can now quickly respond to issues, as opposed to trying to find the technical problem on our end. We can now quickly address the problems of our clients in an effective manner.

I have found some issues with caching; seems to be inconsistent

I have used it for five months.

We have not encountered any deployment issues.

We have encountered very few stability issues, but those could be more due to the stability of our servers.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Customer service is 8/10.

Technical support is 8/10.

We did not previously use a different solution, but we researched other solutions. Incapsula was highly regarded and we were simply wowed.

Initial setup was pretty straightforward on our end. Thanks for that!

We did the implementation in house using our own personnel.

I'm not sure about ROI.

Load balancing and DDoS protection.

Delivery services and information security.

One year.

None, the deployment was very fast and easy.

None.

Excellent, they answered all our questions.

Very good, the information provided by Imperva for the deployment was very clear.

No.

Straightforward.

Imperva and in-house team, the support provided from the Imperva team was very reliable.

Consider the unification of websites.

No.

Security rules and DDoS protection.

Well, just by using the security rules to block all secured areas by IP minimized the chance of sensitive data leaking outside.

I'd like it to work with Let's Encrypt.

1.5 years

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

Once going enterprise, support is excellent.

Once going enterprise, support is excellent.

CloudFlare and I switched because we needed more locations.

Took us 10 minutes and we just waited for the DNS update.

In house.

No ROI since we use it for protection. Its an additional expense with no ROI expectations.

Always check the enterprise option, it gave us great rates.

We used CloudFlare in the past and we thought about working with Reblaze.

Try it for 30 days, it will amaze you.

Imperva Incapsula is used for web applications. 

Our customers required the security of their web applications. We were asked to install this solution for their web solutions based on their throughputs and requirements.

We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection.

When using protection for some web applications, the customer may encounter a few issues.

I have been working with Imperva Incapsula for several months.

We have deployed the cloud version, and we use the on-premise version for testing.

Imperva Incapsula is a stable solution.

Imperva Incapsula is scalable.

We have two or three users in our company.

In order to increase our usage, We must publicize the fact that we have such a solution. I believe we had to use LinkedIn or some other solution to publish it. We need to inform our customers that we have a solution like this.

Technical support was very helpful.

The initial setup is not overly complex, but it could be easier.

There is a license or subscription renewal that our customers pay.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Imperva Incapsula an eight out of ten.

IncapRules, Login Protect & CDN are the most valuable features of Incapsula.

Incapsula gave us an incredible visiblity in terms of security.

HTML minification could be improved. The actual HTML minification does not provide the maximum HTML minification nor provides the best result. 

We are using this solution on our customer for three months.

No issues, setup pretty easy and straightforward.

No issues.

No issues.

The web support could be enhanced, you need to call to get immediate support.

Very easy setup!

• It provides real-time traffic analysis.
• It gives location/hit/page view details.
• It can easily and instantly block IPs.
• We can investigate questionable and suspicious IPs.

We're able to better manage network traffic with its analysis and security tools.

It also helped us investigate and narrow down possible attacks from thousands of hits from suspicious IPs. In so doing, it also noted the presence of background scripts.

It's helped us find vulnerabilities in our organization.

• Its firewall should be made less penetrable so that if an IP is blocked once, it doesn't penetrate again.
• The IP analytics should show trends and potential problem areas so that We can take action to minimize the occurrence of more hits from malicious IPs.
• The process of reporting, analysis, and clearance could be improved.