Prolexic vs. Arbor Networks: How do they compare?

3

Trying to advise client who's considering Prolexic, but it's cost-prohibitive compared to Arbor Networks. 

Any feedback on both is welcome. 

Anonymous avatar x30
Guest
As seen in
Logosasseeninsmall

3 Answers

Dde676a2 48e9 426a 83cc 06784357b03e avatar

Both Prolexic and Arbor are OK solutions.

Both have a very limited number of PoPs (Only 4-6 global locations, adds significant latency) and both have trouble reacting to attacks quickly and automatically (without human intervention). Also both will have trouble handling Application layer attacks over TLS. Arbor will also requires on-premise equipment which is a lot of hassle and doesn't scale.

I would highly recommend checking out Impreva Incapsula, which is a more modern solution that's more equipped to deliver a premium service (at reasonable prices).

Disclosure: I work for Imperva.

Like (0)13 January 17
A2677e73 3c95 4db0 9a5b 56d28884f396 avatar

There are two aspects for this query:
1) if the client has multiple applications that needs to be considered for DDos protection I will prefer to go with Prolexic, but
2) if the client has multiple network devices and those devices are front facing for being a security appliances then I recommend to go with Arbor network for DDos protection, because it has the capability to handle large size of packet length as well as the volume of the packets.
It's has been a great experienced for me by evaluating arbor networks which is very well when considering the protection of network devices (core, edge) having a virtualized environment and on site solutions .
For prolexic they have a wide verity of solution for applications that are custom develop or using a vendor based application. It's function

Like (0)14 December 16
398e0b63 a052 4718 9eec c2caf5e835c3 avatar
Frederic St PierreReal UserTOP 20

From experience between Akamai prolexic and Arbor to me is the mitigation techniques and integration to your network. Prolexic uses Netflow in order to detect an attack and then switch traffic to their solution in order to mitigate the attack. The most effective technique to mitigate attacks according to them is an always-on solution, meaning that you're routing your traffic to their network, which adds a hop and depending on your geographical location, can increase network latency.

Arbor solutions usually work with On-Premise Equipment which does mitigation of low and slow, layer 7 or low yield volumetric attacks. The advantage of Arbor solutions lies in a hybrid solution providing this on-prem technology and cloud scrubbing center capabilities for volumetric attacks which your network cannot handle.

Like (0)14 December 16
As seen in
Logosasseeninsmall

Sign Up with Email