Micro Focus UFT Developer Previous Solutions

TestMana6b72
Research & Development Engineer at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
I switched from development to quality testing. Since that time, I used many products including UFT. We had some solutions in basic. After that, I used several products for testing including UFT, Selenium, Cucumber, QCALM (also known as just QC), Dynatrace and more to check on the environment that things like memory and CPU were functioning as expected. Some of these things I would still use depending on the situation. It is not necessarily the product that made us need to switch to UFT. It is the business need and regulations. View full review »
Directinfo46
Director, Information Technology Infrastructure at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
No other product has been able to provide continuous testing and to make a developer responsible for automation testing and all the tools needed except the LeanFT. Mainly, there was only one competitor, Selenium, which is open-source. Since it's open-source, it has its own limitations, which is why we did not choose them. View full review »
reviewer956898
Senior Test Automation Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The reason we chose this solution is because it is the company-wide chosen solution. It integrates with other tools, such as ALM, a test management tool. We are also going to move up to Octane, but Octane also integrates with UFT. Octane also introduces the possibility of connecting to other tools via Jenkins or Bamboo. The main connection with most ports will be UFT, though. If you look at other tools that are compatible in the market, such as IBM or smaller, open-source tools, they will fit for us, but they have the issue that they only work with one protocol. They only work with Web. If you have complex protocols, then you are forced to use the commercial solutions. IBM or another one that's based on another technique would then also work. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus UFT Developer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
419,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1270638
Programator at a software R&D company with 10,001+ employees
Prior to my work with UFT Pro and C#, two others had been writing tests using UFT Basic. This requires that the tests be written in Visual Basic. They are very slow and the Visual Basic version generates a lot of duplicate code. The C# version allows me to use a special library that helps to avoid code duplication. View full review »
Phil Ward
Senior Test Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Micro Focus UFT is an okay solution for specific purposes that we use it for. I also use Katalon Studio and, since Katalon Studios is Java and Groovy-based, it is much better and more up-to-date for testing. View full review »
reviewer1273218
Software Tester at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We are also working with Selenium, which is an open-source solution. We did not use another tool before these. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Micro Focus UFT Developer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
419,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.