Microsoft ATA [EOL] Room for Improvement

President and CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
I would say sometimes it gets a little bit cumbersome to upkeep. Sometimes it's heavy to upkeep, however, that's about it in terms of my feedback of any weaknesses. I don't have any major complaints. There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area. I would like more integration with Microsoft, and security solutions better. View full review »
Director Cyber Security at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The software is not as advanced as many competitors. It doesn't offer the level of granularity that other software might. It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict. The solution may not integrate well with solutions that aren't in the Microsoft family. View full review »
Security Officer
I would like to see continuous improvement in upcoming releases. In terms of room for improvement, some of the newer features are not completely there yet. I have confidence that they will get there but there's still room for improvement. For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Splunk, Varonis and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.