We've never reached any connection limits for a single AP as we do not have enough devices to overload it> Even at a maximum load, we do not experience access slowdown.

It's scalable for medium enterprises. For a large enterprise, we still have to rely on human access, not Stellar anymore because we have a limitation on how many access points we can control from the human access Stellar platform. So the number of APs are limited, which is quite notable for a large organization looking for 1,000 or 2,000 APs.

I rate Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar a seven out of ten for scalability. Four engineers are currently using Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Stellar in our organization.

This is suitable for small, medium, and enterprise-level companies.

We have approximately 200 clients that use this solution.

The solution has good scalability.

I rate the solution’s scalability ten out of ten.

No, when we need to scale up, we follow the vendor instructions and directions for adding more devices of same type and some configurations in CLI.

OmniAccess WLAN's main advantage is its scalability which is better than CISCO.

The solution is scalable. It works for any size of company, no matter if it's a small business, enterprise, government, education, hospitality, or any other type of customer.

It's also easy to scale, as it's a soft controller. You just have to add on the licenses. It can scale up to 4,000 access points.

When you choose the best WLAN option you won’t have problems.

No issues encountered.

No. We currently have >100 users and increasing.