CircleCI vs IBM Rational Build Forge vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CircleCI Logo
1,878 views|1,711 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
679 views|600 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CircleCI, IBM Rational Build Forge, and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Amy DeLorge
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts.""The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.""It's a stable product.""The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc.""The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications.""Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

More CircleCI Pros →

"All features are useful. Our customer doesn't have any complaints about the tool. It works pretty well for what they want and what they need to do.""Very good reporting features."

More IBM Rational Build Forge Pros →

"We significantly reduced build times of large projects (more than 80k lines of Scala code) using build time on Jenkins as a time sample. It reduced the developer write-test-commit cycle time, and increased productivity.""I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company.""It is a stable solution.""Configuration management: It is so easy to configure a Jenkins instance. Migrate configuration to a new environment just by copying XML files and setting up new nodes.""The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its continuous deployment. We can deploy to multi-cluster and multi-regions in the cloud.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration between different tools.""The simplicity of Jenkins and the evolving ecosystem of Jenkins are most valuable. Today, you do not have to write a pipeline from scratch. The library functionality of Jenkins helps you to bring all those in ready-made, and you also get the best practices for them. That is a great feature of Jenkins, and that is why it is being used significantly.""We have started to integrate Pipelines as a part of a build, and built a library of common functions. It simplified and made our build scripts more readable."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI.""Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing.""The solution’s pricing could be better.""Billing is a mess."

More CircleCI Cons →

"Its logging can be improved. When something goes wrong, it is not always very easy to find the problem. It is hard to identify whether the problem is because of low memory in the server or some configuration in Rational Build Forge. The error logs are not very detailed, and they should provide more information. It should also have more integration with third-party tools. It would be great to have more integration with third-party tools.""Not user friendly for the layman."

More IBM Rational Build Forge Cons →

"The enterprise version is less stable than the open-source version.""I think an integrated help button, that respected the context of the change/work in hand, would be a worthwhile improvement.""Jenkins can improve by continuing to add additional plugins for all the new solutions that are coming out within the cloud sphere.""Partition security for the workflow of projects is not yet an option.""Jenkins could improve by adding the ability to edit test automation and make time planning better because it is difficult. It should be easier to do.""Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial.""Jenkins should adopt the Pipeline as Code approach by building a deployment pipeline using the Jenkins file.""Tasks such as deployment, cloning, database switchover, and all other database missions and tasks are being done through Jenkins. If a job does not go through, at times the error message does not clearly indicate what caused the failure. I have to escalate it to the Jenkins DevOps team just to see what caused the failure. If the error message is clear, then I wouldn't have to escalate the issue to different teams."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
  • More CircleCI Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.
    Top Answer:Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly… more »
    Top Answer:We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,878
    Comparisons
    1,711
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    4.0
    19th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    679
    Comparisons
    600
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    AWS CodeBuild logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GoCD logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Rational Build Forge
    Learn More
    Overview
    CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.

    IBM Rational Build Forge is an adaptive execution framework that helps automate and standardize the software assembly process. Rational Build Forge helps teams standardize repetitive tasks, improve software quality and manage compliance mandates. This software scales to 25 seats. Rational Build Forge delivers:
    Flexibility - gives developers self-service access to preconfigured build processes from within their integrated development environment (IDE). You can add IBM Rational software products to further enhance automation, reporting and integration.
    Productivity - accelerates build and release cycles through iterative development, parallel processes and efficient use of hardware.
    Compliance - simplifies compliance management with self-documenting audit trails and role-based security.
    Compatibility - increases team efficiency with centralized build and release management using the tools you have today.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
    Cars.com
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Educational Organization10%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Media Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.