We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, RSA Authentication Manager, and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The product is stable and reliable."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"The product enables SSO."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the SecurID."
"The most valuable feature is the provision part. The mapping and the logging is also very good. In addition, the troubleshooting, from a console point of view, is easy for administration and on the provisioning and logging part."
"Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones."
"It stands out as a comprehensive and adaptable solution that excels in both on-premises and cloud-based authentication, offers strong security with multi-layered authentication, and boasts a well-maintained product with reliable performance."
"It is a stable solution. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"It is a good solution for token identification."
"I have found RSA Authentication Manager to be scalable."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"Scalable and stable."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"The customization capability of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is not very flexible."
"It does the job I paid for, but the graphical interface could be improved."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
"Our major problem is the authentication via Microsoft, via Microsoft cloud systems. This is our major aim, to be a valued product for the future. The biggest problem is to work against cheap cloud systems. Cloud identification is our main problem at this time."
"We found technical support was not very responsive to our requests for assistance."
"Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive."
"We have encountered issue when trying to expand this particular solution for a large set of users across the country."
"There is room for improvement in the RSA support."
"We are not planning on using the solution in the future."
"Enhancing the user interface and expanding their marketing efforts in regions like Nigeria and West Africa could be beneficial."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The stability could improve."