FlexPod XCS vs IBM PurePower System vs Rackspace OpenStack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp Logo
869 views|407 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
125 views|44 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Rackspace Logo
109 views|94 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FlexPod XCS, IBM PurePower System, and Rackspace OpenStack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Converged Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We enjoy the standardization and having things consistent across the whole data center sphere.""I have never seen a more resilient HA product out there then NetApp's solution. If I want to know that I'm putting my workload on a solution, from a storage perspective, that is going to be up 100% of the time, I'm going to choose NetApp.""Our data center rack space collapsed and our manpower decreased.""The nice thing about NetApp is the ease of administration. We have a new storage admin who did not do storage at all, and he has fallen right in with it. There are no real issues.""The most valuable is the one support. I have a 1-800 number. I call one number rather than figuring out whether it's a network, compute, or storage issue. It is beautiful and works out nicely.""We have significantly less latency now with our imagery.""The best thing about this solution is the tight integration with VMware, Cisco, and NetApp from both a hardware and software perspective.""With the components that come in FlexPod, it has enabled us to reduce connectivity down to one wire, whereas before, we had eight, 12, or 20 wires going to one server."

More FlexPod XCS Pros →

"We never have any issues or glitches."

More IBM PurePower System Pros →

"Apart from the main features, I really appreciate OpenStack's microservices architecture and its flexibility for deployment with different tools.""There are many services that can be directly used which are not available in VMware.""The solution is stable.""I like its integration with GitLab and its simplicity. OpenStack has a lot of third-party libraries that it uses.""The most valuable feature is the customization. With the customization you can really give the customers what they want.""The documentation was plentiful and very helpful.​""It created a reusable library with OpenStack features.""The initial setup isn't too difficult."

More Rackspace OpenStack Pros →

Cons
"Our environment does not always require this solution, so we are not reaping the optimal ROI.""FlexPods can include the new networking and new virtualization of storage and data center interconnectivity with the networking side of it. They can evolve and grow by connecting pods together.""We would like them to improve the validate designs. It is hard to stay in a supported config with the software and firmware versions of the platform. It's always a concern to ensure things not only work well, but they work at all. If we run into incompatibility inside of the NetApp, Cisco, or VMware versions, it can cause real issues.""Areas for improvement would be the support for the engineering team, who seem to have no clue when you open a case, the communication with and recognition of resellers, and the documentation, with could be more detailed.""The continued simplification will be a continued battle and evolution for both Cisco and NetApp, especially on the FlexPod product.""It would be nice to have something like an automated, upgrade solution The tasks needed to upgrade the hardware within FlexPod are still quite behind compared to some of its other aspects. That's more on the Cisco side.""I would like more orchestration and networking in-between the VMs, the virtualization layer for networking. I would like to see better tools for this.""The management interface of the UCS part of it is a little bit clunky. It uses Java, so when we're managing it, if I have a computer that doesn't have Java on it or has the wrong version of Java on it, there's some iterations that have to happen to get into the manager of it."

More FlexPod XCS Cons →

"The management is really difficult when it comes to systems with traditional services."

More IBM PurePower System Cons →

"OpenStack is difficult for the novice in terms of beginning to use cloud tools.""VMware has a side-to-side replication feature, which is still more mature than Rackspace OpenStack's which can't be used in a production environment.""OpenStack's UI, while user-friendly, could be improved to offer a more intuitive experience.""It could use more examples in different languages (API use cases).​""So for the main stability, there have been a couple of issues that I've experienced.""The line migration is a problem.""The seamless integration between MySQL services and the rabbitMQ database can be revised during the debugging phase."

More Rackspace OpenStack Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing is very affordable from a FlexPod perspective."
  • "It seems very cost effective once it's in place, and it's easy to expand and easy to add capacity without a lot of extra money."
  • "If your company really needs to be up 100% of the time, and you need to do a private data center, I don't know if I could realistically actually recommend another blueprint."
  • "Anytime that you are buying any storage make sure you understand storage. Do not just buy storage based on what somebody sells you in terms of IO or throughput."
  • "Buy storage based on the solutions you need, the technologies you need, and what will make your life a lot easier down the road."
  • "As a whole, it is inexpensive, and it uses the least amount of parts."
  • "Storage is very expensive. To buy MIC cards and additional storage either on-prem or in the cloud, the IT department does not have money for it, so you need a more niche product or a more flexible way to store your data. That is the benefit that you get from this product."
  • "We purchased the solution through CDW. They are a partner and knowledgeable."
  • More FlexPod XCS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans. The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ). First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors. Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The system is designed for easy scaling. Because we define everything clearly. So when we plug the system in, we apply… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is not cheaper, but stability is more important for us now. We focus on business gains, not static numbers… more »
    Top Answer:FlexPod should focus more on automation. Integrating an automation tool with FlexPod would enable customers to leverage… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Apart from the main features, I really appreciate OpenStack's microservices architecture and its flexibility for… more »
    Top Answer:OpenStack's UI, while user-friendly, could be improved to offer a more intuitive experience. Additionally, the storage… more »
    Top Answer:OpenStack is a cloud provider with several vendors, which have all been used.
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    869
    Comparisons
    407
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    905
    Rating
    8.6
    11th
    Views
    125
    Comparisons
    44
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    6th
    Views
    109
    Comparisons
    94
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    579
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OpenStack
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    FlexPod XCS is the secure platform your applications need from edge to cloud. Easily manage your suite of cloud-native, edge, and enterprise apps. Integrate advanced cloud services without compromising performance, security, reliability, or scale.

    IBM PurePower System offering combines storage devices, networking devices, virtualization capabilities, and management functions into a single infrastructure. The IBM PurePower System offering is provided in several single rack and multiple-rack configurations and vary over time as technology and offerings are increased.
    OpenStack is an open and scalable cloud operating system for building public and private clouds. It provides both large and small organizations an alternative to closed cloud environments, reducing the risk of lock-in associated with proprietary platforms.
    Sample Customers
    University of Sao Paulo, WD-40, The Commonwell Mutual Insurance Group
    Information Not Available
    X.commerce
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    Educational Organization8%
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business55%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Converged Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.