Amazon S3 vs Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage Nearline comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,623 views|5,861 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,661 views|5,683 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Google Logo
2,009 views|1,768 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3, Amazon S3 Glacier, and Google Cloud Storage Nearline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.
To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"S3 is well suited for both big and little data repositories of objects ranging from backup to archive to active video images and much more.""The most useful features of Amazon S3 are the intelligent multipart upload.""Amazon S3 has multiple types of data detection. You can store data on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and long term basis.""Amazon S3 is a stable solution.""The most valuable features are VNet, virtual machines, and Elastic Kubernetes Service.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are its storage capabilities, security, and integration.""Set up a performance and stress-based test suite to measure the endurance of a web application on Amazon AWS cloud system using S3 as the back-end storage infrastructure.""The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are the accuracy and the life cycle policies, which help when moving from Amazon S3 to Amazon Glacier."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"The solution is easy to use.""The pricing is low, and it's dedicated to archiving is valuable to us.""The reliability of storage is the main benefit.""We use the solution for migration.""We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign.""It is a very comprehensive tool.""We like that the price is cheaper.""Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"It provides the necessary support and flexibility to manage data storage effectively, especially during times of variable data flow.""I find the flexibility in storing documents or data and the ease of retrieval valuable with this solution.""The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as salary information, to Nearline.""The capacity and space on offer are excellent.""Nearline is highly stable.""The data structure and the types of data that are supported are very good.""It can isolate files and stop them from corrupting other files.""Google is always introducing new features and tends to have a new release every month."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pros →

Cons
"You need to fully understand the solution's best practices to get the most out of its security features.""Amazon S3's unit of measure for expansion should be smaller.""The query size in Amazon S3 has room for improvement because it's limited. Querying on Amazon S3 is also expensive with Amazon Athena, so that's another area for improvement in the solution.""Could include some additional security features.""Amazon S3 could improve by providing some type of storage notification.""The solution's data transfer speed could be improved.""The down side is the web app should be aware of all the features that S3 provides in order to leverage its full potential.""Amazon S3 could improve the performance reports. It would be a benefit if they were more comprehensive."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"The technical support has room for improvement.""The tool could be made cheaper.""Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand.""Amazon S3 Glacier's data retrieval time is slow compared to other AWS storage services and should be improved.""The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved.""The solution's pricing is too expensive and could be improved.""The user experience must be improved.""The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"They should provide more options or flexibility in terms of pricing.""They need a better, more visual, user interface for folders and files.""The pricing is quite high.""The solution needs to offer better System Information and Event Management (SEIM). I'd like to discover how we could implement something like that within Google's cloud.""The suggestion for improvement primarily revolves around cost efficiency.""The UI could be a little bit more effective.""The interface for managing file storage in the buckets could be improved.""Nearline security could be better. The solution could integrate better with SEIM tools."

More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Right now, for the number of servers and the storage that I have, I would say I'm charged between $125 and $150 per month."
  • "Google Cloud Storage Nearline is very inexpensive. It costs us less than $50 a month to store our files. We use approximately 10 terabytes. Overall, I would rate the product a five out of five for affordability."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Nearline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according… more »
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Nearline is the access. It's helpful to move data that is generated once a month, such as… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing of the different storage classes is hard to compare. The higher the zone, the higher the price. The… more »
    Top Answer:The UI could be a little bit more effective. Now, the UI is just a white background, but it's really helpful if there… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    9,623
    Comparisons
    5,861
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    6,661
    Comparisons
    5,683
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    2,009
    Comparisons
    1,768
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    557
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Amazon Glacier
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    A low-cost, highly-durable and highly available storage service for infrequently accessed data, data archiving, online backup and disaster recovery. Data is available instantly, not within hours or days. With sub-second average response times and 1 cent per GB/month pricing, Cloud Storage Nearline gives you terrific performance at a low cost.

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Real Estate/Law Firm12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization67%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Integrator4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    University7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise21%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Public Cloud Storage Services
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.