We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Wasabi

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon S3 Glacier Logo
4,451 views|4,183 comparisons
Wasabi Logo
831 views|781 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower.""We like that the price is cheaper."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros »

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

More Wasabi Pros »

Cons
"The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data.""I would like to see the retrieval time reduced."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons »

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

More Wasabi Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is no license, you pay for what you use.""Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

More Wasabi Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
554,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, which… more »
Top Answer: I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower.
Top Answer: The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data. People will want to keep the content for a… more »
Top Answer: Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly.
Top Answer: I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're… more »
Top Answer: I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve. You can sign in to your account and monitor it. Beyond that, I don't know if there are any other bells and… more »
Ranking
Views
4,451
Comparisons
4,183
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
411
Rating
8.5
Views
831
Comparisons
781
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
384
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Amazon Glacier
Learn More
Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon S3 Glacier
Learn more about Wasabi
Sample Customers
King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company23%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company22%
Manufacturing Company6%
Media Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: November 2021.
554,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 2 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 12th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 1 review. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Wasabi is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective cloud storage service with good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "It's cost-effective and simple". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Block Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Storage Nearline and Microsoft Azure File Storage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure Block Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Zadara and Google Cloud Storage Nearline.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.