We use Amazon S3 for a file storing system. The solution is cloud-based.
We're working with 10-15 applications.
We use Amazon S3 for a file storing system. The solution is cloud-based.
We're working with 10-15 applications.
The most valuable feature is the sharing capabilities.
I would like there to be more support without needing to use Transfer Family.
I have used Amazon S3 for about five years but not at my current organization.
I would rate the stability as eight out of ten.
The scalability is good.
I have also used Azure.
The price is okay.
I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.
I would recommend Amazon S3 if you have the use case for it, but Azure provides a similar service.
Our primary use of S3 is for storing data. I'm a senior associate.
This solution is valuable in that it helps us store all types of data. It's also easy to delete data when necessary and it's very user-friendly.
The upload speed for data and documents is sometimes slow and it would be helpful if that were improved. The other issue is that downloading data is quite expensive.
I have used this solution for the past three years.
We occasionally face stability issues with respect to upload speed but it's very rare.
The customer support is good but it could be improved. When we raise a ticket, sometimes we have to make a follow-up call because we haven't heard back from them.
Positive
The initial setup was easy.
I find Amazon to be more efficient and more scalable compared to other solutions on the market.
I find this solution good for both structured and non-structured data, as well as data access and encryption. It reads more requests per second than other solutions.
I rate this solution seven out of 10.
Our company has 30 staff members who use the solution for data storage.
Uploads are secure and occur instantly.
The solution provides good data movement from Snowball to the S3 bucket.
It is difficult to retrieve files in an emergency because the public cloud has data limits for immediate downloads so they often take twelve hours. We need better, immediate control of our content.
The cloud and on-premises solutions should sync all data.
Infrastructure services could be improved to provide free education related to the solution's features. For example, developers who do not have experience building games could learn how to do so with free support.
I have been using the solution for nine years.
The solution is very stable and I rate it an eight out of ten.
The solution is scalable and there are no limits on data uploads. We upload four TB of data a day.
Technical support can be challenging because we have to work through account managers. For urgent situations, our tech team contacts support to get assistance.
I rate support a four out of ten.
Neutral
The initial setup and creating buckets are very simple.
We implemented the solution in-house.
Not many products in the market beat the solution in terms of quality or price.
The solution charges for data downloads.
We currently use the public cloud but want to use a private cloud because there are speed issues when retrieving files in an emergency. For example, retrieving emergency video files might take twelve hours because the cloud will not allow immediate downloads. A private cloud will allow us to retrieve files immediately without a data limit.
We are in talks with GreenLake, Atlassian, and Dell to find the best solution that optimizes our cost. There is a retrieval cost associated with the public cloud so we want to optimize these costs and switch to a private cloud.
The solution offers great quality and price. We are closely evaluating the cost of other solutions to determine if it is worth it to move from a solution that works well for us.
Cost is a primary concern because we manage three petabits of data.
I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We use this solution for storing the input-output of our processing. We are customers of Amazon.
Version control is great, it means we can store incremental data, and get high availability and fault tolerance. If we accidentally delete something we can recover it by using S3. It also enables the option of reverting to old files.
The read drive speed is not as fast as it should be. If we want to access data, we should be able to do it quickly.
I've been using this solution for five years.
The solution is scalable, there are no limitations on storage. There are around 10,000 users in the company.
Amazon provides good documentation for this solution so we've never contacted technical support.
The initial setup is easy. It just requires logging in to AWS, and it's available.
This is a pay-as-you-use, on-demand service. It's not very expensive.
We went with S3 because of its high availability, fault tolerance and scalability. Those are the three main reasons we chose it.
Our company uses the solution for deep CI backups. We have thousands of customers who use the solution and access our application.
The solution is good and includes all the features we expect.
The solution's pricing should be modified to automatically expand storage based on prior usage. For example, our monthly usage is very low so our storage allotment should be increased by 200%.
I have been using the solution for five years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is scalable.
Technical support is good so I rate it them a nine out of ten.
Positive
I did not previously use another solution.
The setup is very easy.
The pricing depends on your region and is reasonable. For example, the price per gigabyte is .0025 in the South Pacific and .0023 in Europe.
We use the solution and EC2 with similar frequency depending on use case.
I recommend the solution and rate it a nine out of ten.
When we develop applications, it generates files. We use Amazon S3 as a backup and storage solution.
The product helps to define storage type based on the requirement.
Amazon S3 should have more frequent updates.
I have been working with the product for two years.
Amazon S3 is stable.
My company has around 100 users for Amazon S3. It is scalable and easy to increase or change configuration.
Amazon S3's tech support provides necessary solutions and answers to our problems.
Positive
The tool's deployment is easy. It comes with guided instructions, which makes it easy to monitor and manage. The tool's deployment took 30 minutes to complete. We have one AWS engineer to help us implement the tool on the cloud.
I did the deployment myself.
The tool's licensing costs are monthly and cheap.
We use the solution to store deployment logs and tech information.
The solution is simple and affordable to use. The solution's API Integration requests are straightforward; we just have to integrate and acquire the service.
They should improve in the area of metadata curation. Sometimes we open metadata via open source or ground stations in the area. They should design some features with improved performance where we can gain insights as well. It will help in maintaining the solution considering the cost.
It would be great if they get a new feature with the QV mechanism.
We have been using the solution for seven or eight years.
I rate the solution's stability as a ten.
It is a very scalable solution. I have 100-300 colleagues using the solution.
The setup was straightforward. We had an engineer help us establish configuration between the backend and the object. We had to work on the permissions, and the rest was easy.
We have an in-house engineering team. They are skilled in doing the entire setup.
It's worth the price considering its functionality.
I advise others to have a support team. They should ensure the best practices for transferring the use history from AWS onto other applications via the cloud. It's very easy to find those actions. Most importantly, they must be very careful about the solution's security. They should plan the automation model right, ensuring to maintain the surface area for security. Otherwise, they have nothing to worry about as the solution is well established.
I rate the solution as a ten.
We are using the solution to secure the content.
The solution's most valuable feature is its Uptime availability, especially for the cloud version. Its peak uptime is good. It offers 99.9% availability.
The Folder Access policy needs improvement. They should make it much more user-friendly, then it will be fine. The major challenge is the inability to create more than ten policies. When we want to create folder access, they provide some policy and then give the folder access. There should be an option to have a sub-folder for each folder. They should provide a distribution of access. Presently, we can't access all subfolders at a time.
We have been using the solution for three years now.
I rate the solution's stability as a ten.
The scalability of the solution is ten out of ten. We have more than fifty users of the solution at our company.
When we raise the ticket, we get a response within five to seven days. There needs some improvement.
Neutral
The setup process is simple as we are using the cloud solution. We configured the setting as per our requirements.
I rate the solution as one for pricing. It is expensive but much more secure.
I recommend the solution to others and rate it as a nine out of ten.