I know that it's scalable. It's out there and has been in use. I assume that it is going to be very scalable.

I plan to use it more. At this time I am using a lot of the built-in repositories or examples that they have to create examples for my clients. I am going to start to try to populate my type of examples with what I can see as being particularly useful for clients to be able to leverage.

It is very scalable. You can have different versions. You can add other features to it. You can have the base implementation, which is more for enterprise architects and people who are inputting the data about the architecture. There is also an enterprise version of it, which is the browser version to give you the business intelligence views, the visualizations, and the dashboards. It has unlimited scalability.

It is very much scalable.

I did not test the product's scalability. In our company, we did not reach its optimal level of scalability.

We have 10 to 12 users of the solution in our company.

We do have plans to increase the usage of the tool in our company for the hosts, including the viewers of the solution, which is the whole IT team that involves hundreds of people.

I think that it is possible to scale this solution because this is what they are saying to the customers, but it is not so clear.

Avolution ABACUS is scalable. I have used it with complex architecture and in a complex environment where there was a lot of data in the repository. The performance was acceptable. It was good. I've never faced any slowness or hiccup while using it.

Currently, we have ten licenses. Eight of them are already being utilized. So we have eight current users up and running, and we still have two licenses because we hope to expand usage to other users. But there is no scalability requirement in our set up. If we needed to scale more than the ten licenses that we have, we could just purchase more.  

This solution is scalable.

It is vastly scalable but you can't run it on a Mac or Linux so it has limitations. We don't have plans to increase the usage. We're happy with what we're using it for. 

It needs more support from the Federated EA.