Azul Zing Previous Solutions

it_user332814

Chief Information, Officer at LMAX Exchange

We used Oracle's Java implementation and switched because upgrading from v6 to v7 led to significant performance regression. Also, we had reached a latency floor that we were unable to get past without a better garbage collector or a significant re-write of the implementation of our software.

View full review »

it_user326502

Enterprise Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

We were trying to scale horizontally as workload increased, but there is a limit to that. Zing can absorb a lot more workload, by just adding more memory and/or CPUs, which is easer then provisioning more and more servers.

View full review »

it_user332961

Manager of IT Infrastructure at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

All other solutions were open-source JVMs and none of them had the features of the Zing JVM.

View full review »

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

April 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Azul Systems, Oracle, Red Hat and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

it_user492792

Architect/Designer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

We use to use the Oracle JVM and switched due to the application pauses due to GC. Even the latest Oracle/OpenJDK G1 collector does not come close to the performance of Zing.

View full review »

it_user318894

Senior Vice President for Product Development at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We previously used Oracle JVM.

View full review »

it_user331437

Software Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We switched due to performance issues

View full review »

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

April 2024