CA Automic Service Orchestration Room for Improvement

Holger Sandmann
System Consultant Process Automation at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
We are hoping some features that were available in the past will become available again. I believe they are on the roadmap and are in the pipeline, so we hope they will be available again during the year. In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected. View full review »
Solution Consultant at a tech services company
From my point of view, we need clearer, more open RPSs. As an example, they need to go forward with risk RPSs. There needs to be features with more direction towards microservices, so we can have more modules which are usable. Over time, the whole Automic engine will be more complex as it is now. It will become harder to operate. Therefore, I don't like to see too many features in one engine, like more modules with options. What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about CA (A Broadcom Company), Pega, Bonitasoft and others in Process Automation. Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email