Compare A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. HAProxy

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is ranked 3rd in Application Delivery Controllers with 10 reviews while HAProxy is ranked 5th in Application Delivery Controllers with 2 reviews. A10 Networks Thunder ADC is rated 8.8, while HAProxy is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of A10 Networks Thunder ADC writes "A reliable product that is very easy to configure and administrate while being cost-effective". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HAProxy writes "A containerized solution for TCP load balancing". A10 Networks Thunder ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Citrix ADC, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, Loadbalancer.org and Radware Alteon, whereas HAProxy is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, NGINX Plus, Citrix ADC, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Fortinet FortiADC . See our A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. HAProxy report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Logo
5,922 views|4,337 comparisons
HAProxy  Logo
17,128 views|12,295 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. HAProxy and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
427,353 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
A lot of our SSL management is done on the front-end side, so there is one pane of glass for a lot of our security certificates. It gives us visibility. It also falls under when certificates are going to expire. Even for servers that are coming down, we can see how that affects the traffic flow by using the services map.The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast.The SLB and GSLB load balancing are the most valuable features. They meet our need to do server-side load balancing and global site load balancing so we can distribute traffic, not only intra-data center, but inter-data center.Compared to F5, which I used about six years ago, the A10 is much easier when routing. You don't have to use the wildcard bits to route it between the different segments. It's much less troublesome to configure.The ease of use is very good. It's very robust. It just sits and works.A10 explained why the latency dropped significantly on a site that we have.We have two appliances and I'm able to move my application from one appliance to another. I don't have to move my whole A10 to be active on the other side or to be passive on the other side. If an application is having a problem, I can just move it using a command.We do have the option of creating virtual chassis, so that gives it a bit more security. If we find an application which is not going to play well in the main pool, we can easily create a virtual chassis and have that application in that virtual chassis. With the virtual chassis we can also create system partitions and have a test system for test applications, and have the others elsewhere.

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC Pros »

It solves a problem for me where I can build files, not based on the health of the check, but rather the speed of the check.

More HAProxy Pros »

Cons
We are starting to do a lot with containers and how the solution hooks into Kubernetes that we haven't explored. I'm hoping that they have a lot of hooks into Kubernetes. That would be the part for improvement: Marketing use cases with containers.There is room for improvement in the upgrading process. Sometimes we have to contact A10 for verification of some stuff.In my opinion, they need to improve their cloud support. There is support for cloud, but not all functions are there, such as high-availability.There is room for improvement in the GUI. I just migrated from the 2.7 software train to the 4.1, and there are still people on 2.7. The latter is a very old GUI if you compare it to F5. It's not as easy to use and a lot of things are missing. They've made a lot of improvements in the 4.1 step, but compared to the ease of use of F5, it's still quite difficult. For people who haven't got a lot of experience, the GUI can be quite challenging.The user interface is what people complain about most of the time, particularly if they don't use it very often. Then they complain that it's a bit clunky.I would like them to provide learning tips and a community forum where users can share ideas. They need more detailed support articles on the A10 website.The solution does logging, but the logging capacity is really small. Because we have a bunch of traffic here, we usually get a logging-side warning that "This many logs were lost because of the heavy traffic." If the logging was better, that would be very good.Traffic flow issues are very difficult, as there's no means for us to analyze the traffic coming in or out of the appliance without technical support.

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC Cons »

The logging functionality could use improvement, as it is a little cryptic.

More HAProxy Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
You get a lot more for your dollar with A10.We did try out the solution’s Harmony analytics and visibility controller for its one-year trial. Due to the cost, we chose not to keep it onsite.We just pay for support in addition to our licensing.As for the initial investment in the hardware, F5 and A10 are quite similar now. For the current A10 solution, the initial cost was about $36,000. As for annual support, the F5 solution would be between $10,000 and $12,000, while the A10 is $2,200 a year for support.There were budgetary constraints that keep us from investing in the single pane of glass traffic management feature. We saw a demo of this feature about a year to a year and a half ago.It is $7000 per unit for the support annually.We previously had F5 and switched because of costs.One of the main reasons for switching away from Cisco was the licensing model. A10 gives you global server load balancing for free, while Cisco charged a significant licensing fee for that.

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC Pricing and Cost Advice »

The only cost is for the image manager, who is responsible for uploading the image, and that is trivial.

More HAProxy Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
427,353 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,922
Comparisons
4,337
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
1,132
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
17,128
Comparisons
12,295
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
279
Avg. Rating
9.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Thunder ADC, AX SeriesHAProxy Community Edition, HAProxy Enterprise Edition, HAPEE
Learn
A10 Networks
HAProxy
Video Not Available
Overview

A10 Networks' application networking, load balancing and DDoS protection solutions accelerate and secure data center applications and networks of thousands of the world's largest enterprises, service providers, and hyper scale web providers.

HAProxy is the most widely used software load balancer and application delivery controller in the world. The core HAProxy application delivery engine is an open source project chiefly maintained by HAProxy Technologies and assisted by a thriving open source community. HAProxy Community Edition is available for free at haproxy.org. HAProxy Enterprise Edition is packaged with additional enterprise class features, services and premium support from HAProxy Technologies.

Offer
Learn more about A10 Networks Thunder ADC
Learn more about HAProxy
Sample Customers
123inkt.nl, Bentley University, Box, Brainshark, Buienradar, Capgemini, CGN/LSN & NAT64, Chengdu Telecom, Club One, Code Ready, CRC Health Group, Cyso, Deutsche Telekom, Earth Class Mail, Excite, FFF Enterprises, Florence County, Framingham State University, From30Booking.com, GitHub, Reddit, StackOverflow, Tumblr, Vimeo, Yelp
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University25%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm17%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government10%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Marketing Services Firm22%
Retailer22%
Media Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Healthcare Company11%
Media Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise62%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise55%
Large Enterprise25%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise2%
Large Enterprise72%
Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. HAProxy and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
427,353 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.