A10 Networks Thunder ADC Overview
What is A10 Networks Thunder ADC?
A10 Networks' application networking, load balancing and DDoS protection solutions accelerate and secure data center applications and networks of thousands of the world's largest enterprises, service providers, and hyper scale web providers.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is also known as Thunder ADC, AX Series.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Buyer's Guide
Download the A10 Networks Thunder ADC Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: April 2021
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Customers
123inkt.nl, Bentley University, Box, Brainshark, Buienradar, Capgemini, CGN/LSN & NAT64, Chengdu Telecom, Club One, Code Ready, CRC Health Group, Cyso, Deutsche Telekom, Earth Class Mail, Excite, FFF Enterprises, Florence County, Framingham State University, From30
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Video
What users are saying about A10 Networks Thunder ADC pricing:
- "One of the main reasons for switching away from Cisco was the licensing model. A10 gives you global server load balancing for free, while Cisco charged a significant licensing fee for that."
- "For the hardware and license, we paid $35,000 per box, which was a one-time cost. Then, for the Gold Support on the two boxes, we pay $9400 annually."
- "As for the initial investment in the hardware, F5 and A10 are quite similar now. For the current A10 solution, the initial cost was about $36,000. As for annual support, the F5 solution would be between $10,000 and $12,000, while the A10 is $2,200 a year for support."
- "You get a lot more for your dollar with A10."
- "We did try out the solution’s Harmony analytics and visibility controller for its one-year trial. Due to the cost, we chose not to keep it onsite."
- "We just pay for support in addition to our licensing."
- "Pricing is one of the features of the product that influence customers to use the product."
- "There were budgetary constraints that keep us from investing in the single pane of glass traffic management feature. We saw a demo of this feature about a year to a year and a half ago."
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
- Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters.
Network Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 18, 2019
A reliable product that is very easy to configure and administrate while being cost-effective
What is our primary use case?* Load balance web traffic * Load balance application traffic * DDoS protection * Carrier Grade Network (CGN) We have the ADC product, as well as the CGN. We are using both the public and private deployment model. We are using AWS as our cloud provider.
Pros and Cons
- "Being a public entity and having a public website which is highly visible with a lot of traffic, we are a target for DDoS. Within the last year, we have had a couple of DDoS attacks which could have affected our web traffic and taken down certain parts of our website. This did not happen because the A10 was able to mitigate the attacks using rate limiting that can be configured for DDoS mitigation on the box."
- "It is very useful to have a simple dashboard where you can login and look into what your traffic patterns are, then look and see what times of day you're experiencing the heaviest traffic. You can quickly identify if you are possibly having a security issue or security breach. It makes it very easy to use the box."
- "When it comes to support, there is always room for improvement. First call resolution is not always there for urgent issues. The first call resolution is something that could be improved upon."
- "They need to make the user interface (GUI) a bit more usable and intuitive. Some features can be a little difficult to find at times. Sometimes, the workflow in the GUI doesn't match the workflow of an actual workflow. E.g., if I want to create a load balancer application, sometimes you've got to do things a bit out of order in the GUI in order to make it work right."
What other advice do I have?It has been a good, reliable solution for us. If you want a reliable solution that is very easy to configure and administrate, the A10 is the right choice. It is a very cost-effective solution. I would always pick A10 unless there was a specific feature set that one of the other vendors offered and I absolutely needed. We do not use the solution’s Secure Service Mesh to optimize traffic within Kubernetes and containers today, but that is something we would like to do in the future.
Network Analyst at Alamo Colleges
Sep 10, 2019
Load balancing works really well, and it provides persistent cookies, source IPs, and good security
What is our primary use case?We are using ADC for load balancing. Most of our enterprise applications are behind ADC. It's on-premise.
Pros and Cons
- "We have two appliances and I'm able to move my application from one appliance to another. I don't have to move my whole A10 to be active on the other side or to be passive on the other side. If an application is having a problem, I can just move it using a command."
- "We do have the option of creating virtual chassis, so that gives it a bit more security. If we find an application which is not going to play well in the main pool, we can easily create a virtual chassis and have that application in that virtual chassis. With the virtual chassis we can also create system partitions and have a test system for test applications, and have the others elsewhere."
- "The solution does logging, but the logging capacity is really small. Because we have a bunch of traffic here, we usually get a logging-side warning that "This many logs were lost because of the heavy traffic." If the logging was better, that would be very good."
What other advice do I have?In implementing A10, you need to keep in mind your end goal, what is it that you desire? If you're looking for more DDoS, or if you're looking for more firewall-type of capabilities, then you might have to do a little bit more consultation. But if you're looking for ADC and trying to see separation and load balancing, A10 does the job and provides security very well. It has both CLI and a web interface, so it's not too congested nor does it look too busy. Its appearance is very soothing and relaxing so that helps. It does have the reporting capabilities and the capability to send logs to an…
Learn what your peers think about A10 Networks Thunder ADC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IgorVan Den Ouden
Network Architect at a retailer with 201-500 employees
With iRule or aFleX scripting, you can influence the complete packet instead of just a few bytes or bits
What is our primary use case?Our primary use case is load balancing, from Layer 4 to Layer 7, on different partitions. And it's also our internet gateway router with our ISP. We're using the standard DDoS protection which is on the box itself. We have about 91 virtual IP addresses we're load balancing at the moment.
Pros and Cons
- "Compared to F5, which I used about six years ago, the A10 is much easier when routing. You don't have to use the wildcard bits to route it between the different segments. It's much less troublesome to configure."
- "There is room for improvement in the GUI. I just migrated from the 2.7 software train to the 4.1, and there are still people on 2.7. The latter is a very old GUI if you compare it to F5. It's not as easy to use and a lot of things are missing. They've made a lot of improvements in the 4.1 step, but compared to the ease of use of F5, it's still quite difficult. For people who haven't got a lot of experience, the GUI can be quite challenging."
What other advice do I have?The biggest lesson I have learned using the ADC solution is the ease of routing between the different segments that are behind the solution, compared to F5. You have to look at your use cases for load balancing and how much you want to have influence from the traffic. In my opinion, there are only two solutions that are very close to each other, the F5 and the A10, in terms of the way you can influence your traffic. Then it comes down to the price. Security-wise, they each have different angles for how you set it up. We don't use A10's FlexPool consumption-based licensing model. We have some…
User at a government with 501-1,000 employees
Real UserTop 10
Apr 27, 2020
Using services map, we can map traffic from the front-end virtual server to back-end servers
What is our primary use case?Our primary use case is the application delivery controller part where we mainly use the server load balancing features to front-end our back-end servers to give us additional high availability, some resiliency, and some failures. All our applications are hosted on a private on-premises data center. We run our own data center with VMware being the main virtualization platform. Then, running on top of VMware, we have Windows and Linux clusters, so x86 Windows and x86 Linux. Our biggest security concerns are malicious code, user data theft, DDoS attacks, insider attacks, brand damage/loss of… more »
Pros and Cons
- "A lot of our SSL management is done on the front-end side, so there is one pane of glass for a lot of our security certificates. It gives us visibility. It also falls under when certificates are going to expire. Even for servers that are coming down, we can see how that affects the traffic flow by using the services map."
- "We are starting to do a lot with containers and how the solution hooks into Kubernetes that we haven't explored. I'm hoping that they have a lot of hooks into Kubernetes. That would be the part for improvement: Marketing use cases with containers."
What other advice do I have?Start off with Professional Services. It doesn't hurt to get 40 hours of Professional Services to help you stand it up. Usually, that's all you need. It is not a lot of hours. A week's worth of help goes a long way. We can troubleshoot the traffic flow using the services map. Then, we can get flow data out of the device. So, I would rank the solution’s traffic flow management capabilities as adequate. We plan to implement these technologies or strategies in the next three years: move from hardware appliances to software/scale-out solutions, DDoS protection, upgrade TLS/SSL capabilities to…
Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real UserTop 5
Sep 18, 2020
Service a remote workforce with more efficient deployments and enhanced data security.
What is our primary use case?Our primary use case is for servicing a remote workforce. Especially these days when a lot of people are working remotely, a solution like this is important. We have to deploy applications and we do not necessarily want to upload the applications into the cloud or locally on desktops or laptops. ADC is really good for desktop virtualization and application delivery. Instead of having a full client, you look at a projection hosted in the data center. All the processing is being done back in the data center in the corporate domain. Because of the fact that the processing is not being taken care… more »
Pros and Cons
- "It helps with the efficiency of application deployments and data security."
- "The user interface is not as pretty as it could be."
- "There is two-factor authentication built-in, but it could be more robust."
What other advice do I have?It is a pretty good product. On a scale from one to ten (where one is the worst and ten is the best), I would rate A10 Networks Thunder ADC as a nine-out-of-ten. I do not get too many complaints from customers. Giving it a nine seems fair. It works as advertised.
Network Engineer IV at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real UserTop 20
Apr 20, 2020
Looking back at traffic flow data helps us with troubleshooting
What is our primary use case?The A10s that we have in Florida are being used for load balancing. We have a pair of A10s there, an active and a standby, and we are balancing the traffic between. We also use our A10s, in general, for provisioning wireless products. Eventually, we will use our new A10s for more stuff. Our applications are hosted in a private on-premises data center, on public cloud in AWS, and in a hybrid cloud which is primarily public infrastructure. Among our biggest security concerns are malicious code and DDoS attacks.
Pros and Cons
- "The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast."
- "There is room for improvement in the upgrading process. Sometimes we have to contact A10 for verification of some stuff."
What other advice do I have?It's very simple to use, as long as you understand the engineering technology behind it. I would advise going with it. Make sure you have the GUI feature on it so that you can go in and do quick, at-a-glance monitoring. The solution is good for load-balancing your traffic. We don't want to overload other switches, so we pass traffic through the A10 and load-balance it. It also helps us to troubleshoot issues within our network.
IT Head at Medi Assist
Sep 23, 2019
Improves our performance and management, saving us money
What is our primary use case?My primary use case is to use it as a software load balancer. Because of the industry that we operate in, we cannot use cloud. Therefore, we use it on-premise. We have 32 medium boxes, and that's what runs production.
Pros and Cons
- "A10 explained why the latency dropped significantly on a site that we have."
- "I would like them to provide learning tips and a community forum where users can share ideas. They need more detailed support articles on the A10 website."
What other advice do I have?Go for it. It's always better to go with a nimble, growing company. Partner your growth with their journey. It's always beneficial for a stable setup.
VP, Web Services and Cyber Security at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Mar 1, 2020
SLB and GSLB enable us to distribute traffic, not only intra-data center, but inter-data center
What is our primary use case?We use it for SLB and GSLB load balancing. We're using the Thunder ADC 1040 but before that we used their AX 2500.
Pros and Cons
- "The SLB and GSLB load balancing are the most valuable features. They meet our need to do server-side load balancing and global site load balancing so we can distribute traffic, not only intra-data center, but inter-data center."
- "In my opinion, they need to improve their cloud support. There is support for cloud, but not all functions are there, such as high-availability."
What other advice do I have?The biggest lesson I have learned is that even though at that time A10 was an up-and-comer, it was worth the chance. As a smaller player at the time, it provided a product that was stable and provided a better value. Being willing to take a calculated risk was worth it in the long-run. Don't only look at the dominant players like F5. Do your research on vendors that might not have dominant market share. That's not to say that you would just choose to go with any small player. It would have to be a smaller player that has stability and that has at least some size to support you on an enterprise…
See 3 more A10 Networks Thunder ADC Reviews
Product CategoriesApplication Delivery Controllers
Download our free A10 Networks Thunder ADC Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.