We performed a comparison between AccessData FTK [EOL] and Exterro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery."All of the features are most valuable because we're able to recover hard disks."
"We like the reporting functionality. It just seems very clean."
"I think processing could be better. It really takes a lot of space, and it's very expensive to deploy."
"I think one of the pain points I had was the number of emails that had to be sent out. If there was a way to just maybe reduce the bulk — that would be great."
AccessData FTK [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while Exterro is ranked 13th in eDiscovery. AccessData FTK [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Exterro is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AccessData FTK [EOL] writes "A user-friendly forensic toolkit with many valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Exterro writes "Automates processes relating to sharing, reviewing, and collecting electronically stored information (ESI) ". AccessData FTK [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Exterro is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and kCura Relativity.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
