AccessData Group Summation [EOL] vs LexisNexis Concordance Classic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AccessData Group Summation [EOL] and LexisNexis Concordance Classic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
10th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
337
Comparisons
206
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery. Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Summation
Concordance Classic
Learn More
Overview
Litigation software that stores accurate data to be presented in trials, and save money by automating data storage
LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Sample Customers
Archer & Greiner, Bassi Edlin Huie & Blum, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Solomon Ward, AD Triage, Dorsey & Whitney, Shipman & Goodwin,
Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery. Updated: March 2024.
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AccessData Group Summation [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 10th in eDiscovery. AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is rated 0.0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AccessData Group Summation [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with IPRO.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.