OpenText AccuRev vs PTC Integrity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
216 views|92 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
PTC Logo
2,745 views|2,150 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText AccuRev and PTC Integrity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Neha Wanjari
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases.""The product has all the features that we for application managementat a lower cost.""The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves.""The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

More OpenText AccuRev Pros →

"We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""PTC Integrity has good stability.""The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.""The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions.""Complete traceability as per process requirements.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

More PTC Integrity Pros →

Cons
"It is difficult to gain experience with the product because resources and documentation for learning are not available.""What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded.""In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need.""The pricing should be more competitive."

More OpenText AccuRev Cons →

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.""I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.""The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields.""There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility.""The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they already have core agreements with customers. If they offer these functionalities, customers will likely buy their product.""To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.""We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

More PTC Integrity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is a lower cost than other top competetors."
  • More OpenText AccuRev Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their… more »
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. They should improve the pricing.
    Top Answer:The tool's web-based UI needs improvement. Some functionalities don't work yet, and querying items is slow. Also, it's not in the cloud yet. I don't know if they'll do it in the future because they… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    216
    Comparisons
    92
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    2,745
    Comparisons
    2,150
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    218
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev
    MKS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Get the governance and compliance capabilities you need to manage complexity. OpenText AccuRev helps you implement modern development practices at enterprise scale.

    The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
    Sample Customers
    Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee
    TRW Automotive
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company38%
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Transportation Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText AccuRev is ranked 23rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while PTC Integrity is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 12 reviews. OpenText AccuRev is rated 8.6, while PTC Integrity is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of OpenText AccuRev writes "Good packaging features, but reporting is limited". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation". OpenText AccuRev is most compared with Jama Connect, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Codebeamer, Polarion ALM, Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational ALM.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.