We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and PractiTest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."The program is very stable and scalable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while PractiTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis qTest, whereas PractiTest is most compared with TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise, Jira and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.