We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The program is very stable and scalable.""You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pros »

"This solution enables us to link all items usefully, in the way we use Agile.""The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability.""The interface is easy to navigate.""The most valuable feature is the backlog.""Good branching and labelling features.""The most valuable feature is simplicity.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""The most valuable features are test case writing and bug tracking."

More TFS Pros »

Cons
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Cons »

"The test management interface is not very handy.""The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly.""I would like to see the reporting features expanded so that I can see details on the users connected to all of the projects.""The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved.""Integration from Visual Studio could be improved.""They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA.""There should be management of the project built-in.""The reporting functionality is something that they should work on."

More TFS Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is reasonable at this time.""TFS is more competitively priced than some other solutions.""We pay subscription fees on a yearly basis and the price is reasonable.""I wouldn't say that this tool is cheap or expensive but in the middle.""We are using the open-source version.""The price of the solution is cheaper than other competitors and it is a per-user license.""We pay for the license yearly."

More TFS Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS.
Top Answer: In the TFS tool, we, essentially, made the test cases and test tools. The execution of test cases could stand improvement. They have provided many ways to manage the execution, but they can streamline… more »
Ranking
10th
Views
1,662
Comparisons
1,261
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
552
Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
18,018
Comparisons
15,201
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
7.9
Comparisons
Also Known As
Team Foundation Server
Learn More
Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is the full, featured, enterprise ready test management solution directly in Jira. It offers full traceability across issues, requirements, test cases, and execution. The tool allows for flexibility and customisation for test plans and runs. It offers a free and flexible REST API, includes the ability to automate bulk tests, and enables seamless integration with most continuous integration tools. The in-depth reporting capability gives users the ability to analyse and share test data results between development and business teams. It’s the single source of truth to track, manage and optimise your whole test lifecycle right inside Jira software.

Try it now https://marketplace.atlassian....

See the overview video

Benefits:

  • Drive reusability across Jira with cross-project hierarchical repositories for all test assets 
  • Improve collaboration with flexible workflows between traditional and Agile development teams
  • Enhance coverage with end-to-end traceability across all test artifacts
  • Eliminate duplication to increase efficiency with versioning, test data parameters and shared step features
  • Improve visibility and functionality with 70 cross-project reports and gadgets
  • Reduce management time and effort, with rich APIs for integration with test automation and DevOps tools
  • Allows teams to seamlessly collaborate and manage multiple versions of test cases in parallel while providing an audit history of changes

Features:

  • Easy drag and drop organisation, planning and execution 
  • Hierarchical folders to manage and reuse assets across Jira projects, releases and sprints
  • Test case libraries including versioning, shared steps and test data parameters
  • Test plans and runs to manage and track test execution cycles
  • Full traceability of test cases, requirements, test execution results and defects
  • 70 cross-project reports, gadgets and Confluence Macros to track the coverage of your tests with advanced cross project reporting
  • Global and project level settings for customisation and standardisation
  • Custom fields for test cases, test steps, test plans and test runs
  • Migration function to import test cases from files or legacy test management tools
  • REST APIs for integration with test automation and DevOp tools

Use Cases:

  • Integrate CI tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, Travis CI or other development applications like Github, Bitbucket, Datadog via the REST API for end-to-end integration across test case management, execution, and reporting
  • Automate testing at scale, whilst maintaining traceability inside Jira. Scaled to 10,000+ tests across multiple configurations, publishing results in Jira in under 30 minutes
  • Increase efficiency by significantly reducing time spent on test case specification and management
  • Benefit from reusability across Jira projects and single points of maintenance when reusing and organizing test cases
  • Improved visibility of software testing process and quality with 70 out-of-the-box reports, including real-time dashboards
  • Clear end-to-end traceability of requirements, tests, and defects ensuring that the delivered software meets requirements.














Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
Offer
Learn more about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
Learn more about TFS
Sample Customers
IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear,  Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient
Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm17%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Computer Software Company17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 10th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while TFS is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 16 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 8.0, while TFS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "A good repository for test cases, but query capability should be integrated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Good project management features improve discipline and productivity in our application development lifecycle". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TestRail by Gurock, Tricentis qTest, Hiptest and Eggplant Manager, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Polarion ALM. See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.