We performed a comparison between Amazon MQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial Amazon MQ setup is very easy both when you do it on your own or use the self-managed instance."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its managed service aspect. It's simple to implement and use. It requires minimal effort to maintain business operations."
"Amazon MQ is a very scalable solution."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The security is great."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"The product should improve its monitoring capabilities. It needs to improve the pricing also."
"Depending on your use cases, Amazon MQ can be cheap or expensive."
"Amazon MQ is a good solution for small and medium-sized enterprises. It's open-source software, which means it's cheaper than its competitors."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."
"I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting."
Amazon MQ is ranked 9th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 39 reviews. Amazon MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon MQ writes "Provides you with a URL where you can either send or retrieve messages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Amazon MQ is most compared with Amazon SQS, Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, Red Hat AMQ and EMQX, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and EMQX. See our Amazon MQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
