We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main advantage of Glacier is its low cost. It is incredibly cheaper than other storage options, especially for objects you don't access frequently. Glacier would add value if you have a staging area for objects you only need to access occasionally. Since we have data in terabytes between S3 buckets, we can significantly reduce our storage and cost footprint by using Glacier."
"AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything."
"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."
"We use the solution for migration."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly scalable and available solution."
"It is the most feature-rich platform."
"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"It's a scalable product."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The interface is good."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand."
"The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low."
"I would like to see the retrieval time reduced."
"Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out."
"Amazon S3 Glacier could be more secure."
"The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"The product’s pricing must be improved."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 5th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 14th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.